Article View: comp.org.eff.news
Article #72Re: Professional Crackers (was Re: How effective can the SS hope to be?)
From: Fred Gilham
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 1990 15:26
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 1990 15:26
39 lines
2731 bytes
2731 bytes
Mike Godwin writes:
----------------------------------------
I was at a bookstore on Saturday that had a $55 book called COMPUTER
CRIME (it may be a textbook). In looking through the book, which is
aimed at system administrators, MIS guys, and the heads of small
businesses, I noticed no references at all to the kinds of young
explorers we often "hackers" or "crackers." Instead, the the book
seemed based on the a priori proposition that ALL of the computer
crime that sysadmins would be dealing with would be of the
intercorporate or disgruntled employee sort. The book's copyright date
was 1989.
----------------------------------------
Several authors argue that the major financial impact of computer
crime comes from inside jobs. In the March 1990 Communications of the
ACM, the president's letter has the following example:
----------
Take for example the case of Harold Smith and Sammie Marshall.
Between 1976 and 1981, they embezzled $21.3 million from Wells Fargo
Bank. The fraud was nothing but standard old check kiting. Check
kiting is cashing a check on an account whose only deposit is a check
that has not cleared yet and then covering the draft on the other
account with another rubber check from the first bank, which is
covered by a rubber check from the second bank, etc. etc. This can go
on indefinitely. It is a game that anyone can play. A major national
brokerage house was recently fined by the federal government for doing
the same thing on a massive scale. Smith and Marshall played the game
from inside the bank. Instead of using ordinary checks, they used the
bank's branch settlement system to keep a steadily growing mountain of
fraud in circulation within the branch settlement system.
----------
You'd have to make a lot of free phone calls to match that.
--
Fred Gilham gilham@csl.sri.com
``Man was meant to lead with his chin. He is only worth knowing with
his guard down, his head up, and his heart rampant on his sleeve.''
-- Robert Farrar Capon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<21181@well.sf.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!jarthur!usc!apple!well!tenneyReferences:
<44708@apple.Apple.COM> <1990Sep17.032934.15238@cs.rochester.edu> <37273@ut-emx>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!jarthur!usc!apple!well!tenney From: gilham@csl.sri.com (Fred Gilham) Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.news Subject: Re: Professional Crackers (was Re: How effective can the SS hope to be?) Message-ID: <21181@well.sf.ca.us> Date: 21 Sep 90 15:26:46 GMT References: <44708@apple.Apple.COM> <1990Sep17.032934.15238@cs.rochester.edu> <37273@ut-emx> Sender: tenney@well.sf.ca.us Organization: Computer Science Lab, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. Lines: 37 Approved: comp-org-eff-news@well.sf.ca.us In-reply-to: mnemonic@walt.cc.utexas.edu's message of 17 Sep 90 14:13:28 GMT