Article View: comp.org.ieee
Article #177ISO vs. FIPS
From: Cazier
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 1990 20:03
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 1990 20:03
7 lines
782 bytes
782 bytes
What problems would an agency encounter if they requested ISO POSIX in place of FIPS 151-1 POSIX. Are there alternative behaviours allowed in ISO 9945 that would jeopardize maximum portable of applications following ISO vs. FIPS guidelines? Is FIPS 151-1 a proper subset of ISO 9945 or are there items in FIPS 151-1 that do not exist in the ISO version?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<116179@linus.mitre.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!spdcc!merk!alliant!linus!linus!mbunix.mitre.orgShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!spdcc!merk!alliant!linus!linus!mbunix.mitre.org From: cazier@mbunix.mitre.org (Cazier) Newsgroups: comp.org.ieee Subject: ISO vs. FIPS Message-ID: <116179@linus.mitre.org> Date: 6 Aug 90 20:03:57 GMT Sender: usenet@linus.mitre.org Distribution: usa Organization: The MITRE Corp., Bedford, MA Lines: 7