Article View: comp.org.ieee
Article #546Re: PE exam, EIT exam (was: The Title of Engineer)
From: Tony Goodloe
Date: Wed, 10 May 1989 20:02
Date: Wed, 10 May 1989 20:02
15 lines
1292 bytes
1292 bytes
In article <10429@ihlpb.ATT.COM>, res@ihlpb.ATT.COM (Rich Strebendt) writes: > In article <2306@laidbak.UUCP>, jeq@laidbak.UUCP (Jonathan E. Quist) writes: > > In article <6937@ecsvax.UUCP> cjl@ecsvax.UUCP (Charles J. Lord) writes: > > > > What is the point of going through the EIT/PE exams? ... > > For many engineers, there is no reason. The PE certification is, for them, a > neat trophy to hang on the wall. For other engineers it is a necessity. > I was told by one of my professors (who owns a corporation, consulting of course), that AL requires a corp. having engineering as its main business, (however you define that), must have a PE on its Board. With AL being the backward state that everyone knows it is :) I would be surprised if other states didn't have similar rules.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5058@b11.ingr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ingr!b11!goodloeReferences:
<1429PICHER@MAINE> <May.3.00.55.09.1989.3427@paul.rutgers.edu> <10429@ihlpb.ATT.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ingr!b11!goodloe From: goodloe@b11.ingr.com (Tony Goodloe) Newsgroups: comp.org.ieee Subject: Re: PE exam, EIT exam (was: The Title of Engineer) Message-ID: <5058@b11.ingr.com> Date: 10 May 89 20:02:16 GMT References: <1429PICHER@MAINE> <May.3.00.55.09.1989.3427@paul.rutgers.edu> <10429@ihlpb.ATT.COM> Distribution: usa Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL Lines: 15