Re: IMPORTANT: POSIX threatens our use of lp/lpr and friends

Article View: comp.org.sug

Article #182

#182

From: James Buster
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:28

7 lines
823 bytes

My question is, why not standardize a general-purpose batch and queueing
mechanism that happens to work for print spooling than just specify a
print spooler? This seems to me much more useful and elegant than the
current 1003.7 effort.
-- 
				James Buster
			     bitbug@netcom.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan21.192822.7976@netcom.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!butch!netcomsv!netcom.com!bitbug

References: <C15sst.JqA@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1993Jan21.124947.8297@csc.ti.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.org.sug,comp.org.usenix,comp.unix.wizards,comp.unix.bsd,news.sys-admin
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!butch!netcomsv!netcom.com!bitbug
From: bitbug@netcom.com (James Buster)
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: POSIX threatens our use of lp/lpr and friends
Message-ID: <1993Jan21.192822.7976@netcom.com>
Organization: Lynx Real-Time Systems, Inc.
References: <C15sst.JqA@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1993Jan21.124947.8297@csc.ti.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:28:22 GMT
Lines: 7

Reply to Parent Message