Re: SLIP or PPP instead of G proto (Re: USENIX Board Studies UUCP)

Article View: comp.org.usenix

Article #2004

#2004

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 1989 16:23

11 lines
986 bytes

In article <37222@apple.Apple.COM> fair@Apple.COM (Erik E. Fair) writes:
>Peter, what you describe is the same (functionally) as UUCP is now. If
>you're not going to use it interactively, why bother to "connect" over
>a dialup link with IP?

Apart from the potential for interoperability, which Peter has already
mentioned, there is the not-inconsequential issue of using a protocol
which is *documented* (in a complete, accurate, and redistributable way).
-- 
1755 EST, Dec 14, 1972:  human |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
exploration of space terminates| uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1989Dec14.162303.21946@utzoo.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <320@cfcl.UUCP> <7228@ficc.uu.net> <37222@apple.Apple.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.org.usenix
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: SLIP or PPP instead of G proto (Re: USENIX Board Studies UUCP)
Message-ID: <1989Dec14.162303.21946@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
References: <320@cfcl.UUCP> <7228@ficc.uu.net> <37222@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 89 16:23:03 GMT

Reply to Parent Message