Should this group be renamed?

Article View: comp.os.aos

Article #11

#11

From: phys169
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 22:36

6 lines
644 bytes

Just a thought - what about renaming this group to comp.os.dg or aos.vs or
something else to distinguish it from IBM's o/s?  (Since the discussion may
get onto DG terminals and RDOS etc, perhaps something like the former would
be more appropriate anyway).

Mark Aitchison.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug12.103636.283@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!canterbury.ac.nz!phys169

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!canterbury.ac.nz!phys169
Newsgroups: comp.os.aos
Subject: Should this group be renamed?
Message-ID: <1992Aug12.103636.283@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>
From: phys169@csc.canterbury.ac.nz
Date: 12 Aug 92 10:36:36 +1200
Organization: University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Lines: 7