Article View: comp.os.aos
Article #118Re: DG/UX on an MV/20000???
From: John Sambrook
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 1991 21:23
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 1991 21:23
52 lines
2702 bytes
2702 bytes
In article <28117.279dbffe@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> brownrigg@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>(this isn't exactly the right news group, but its as close as they come...)
>
>Can anybody share their experiences with DG/UX running under the MV
>architecture? It was indicated by the local people that Unix and the MVs
>were a very poor match, and that performance was atrociously slow. I hope
>this isn't true! What would be peculair about the MV arch. that would
>promote this?
>
When I was working at the University of Washington we ran both AOS/VS and
DG/UX (and, at one point, MV/UX, ugh.) on an MV/10000. Nobody noticed any
appreciable speed differences. The only real differences when running
DG/UX were:
1. For the first year, every time you called the SSC in Atlanta,
the conversation went something like this:
US: "We're having a problem with our operating system ...."
SSC: "Is EXEC running?"
US: "This is Unix. We don't need no stinkin' EXEC."
SSC: "You're nuts. Everyone's got an EXEC."
US: "Read my lips. Dee-Gee-You-Ecks, not Emm-Vee-You-Ecks!"
SSC: "Oh ..., let me transfer you .... click-click-hummmmm"
2. At least up until I left, the IAC code under DG/UX was never
very reliable.
3. The product was generally at least a year and a half behind
the state of the BSD and/or Sun worlds, at least in terms of
networking support. E.g., no support for nameservers, etc.
4. Everyone was glad to be using UNIX instead of AOS/VS.
5. The C compiler was absolutely wonderful compared to the garden
variety UNIX compilers of the time. I only ever discovered one
bug, which was fixed in the next revision.
I'd like to suppose that all of these issues have been resolved since
I left the University about a year ago. But I doubt it. I also doubt
that DG can afford to spend anything on development of DG/UX for the
MV line. Why would anyone buy an MV these days?
Seriously, DG had a lot of good people, but the timing was about five
years too late.
Only my opinions, mind you!
--
John Sambrook DNS: john@amc.com
Applied Microsystems Corporation UUCP: amc-gw!john
Redmond, Washington 98073 Dial: (206) 882-2000 ext. 630
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5108@amc-gw.amc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!nwnexus!amc-gw!johnReferences:
<28117.279dbffe@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!nwnexus!amc-gw!john From: john@amc-gw.amc.com (John Sambrook) Newsgroups: comp.os.aos Subject: Re: DG/UX on an MV/20000??? Message-ID: <5108@amc-gw.amc.com> Date: 24 Jan 91 21:23:22 GMT References: <28117.279dbffe@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Reply-To: john@amc-gw.amc.com (John Sambrook) Organization: Applied Microsystems, Redmond, WA Lines: 52