Article View: comp.os.linux.development.system
Article #129Re: asymmetric TCP/IP for 'simplex' cable modems?
From: Joel K. Gallun
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 00:00
48 lines
2792 bytes
2792 bytes
Przemek Klosowski <przemek@rrdjazz.nist.gov> writes: > My local cable company is going to offer a cable modem capability, > soon. The speed is supposed to be around 1MB/s but unfortunately > they initially are deploying a one-way system: only download packets > go over the cable---the uplink is via a a regular modem. BTW, the > cable modem has 10BaseT interface, which then goes to the Ethercard > in the PC. It should work fine with linux. See Phil Karn's web page for info on using linux with the roadrunner cable modem service. All you have to do is point your default route to the right place and you may have to configure DHCP client software if they dont offer static IP addresses. > How would one go about setting up a Linux system to route outgoing > packets via the PPP interface, while receiving the incoming traffic > via Ethernet? You don't do any of that. The external box takes care of all that. All you have to do is send it ethernet frames. > Can it be done by simply setting up some static routes, ... With an external box you just point default at the address they give you. It could either be the address of the cable modem if it is a L3 (IP layer) device or the address of the router at the headend if it is an L2 (MAC layer) device. The GI external modem is an IP layer device. LANcity modems are MAC layer devices. There are also many other vendors, but they all fall into one of those categories. > ... or would it require patches to the network stack? Without having > studied the appropriate pieces of the kernel, i'd guess that similar > functionality is needed for net load balancing, where packets also > are split across several net interfaces. If it was an internal modem (like the GI surfboard) you would be screwed. First you would have to write a driver for the card (good luck getting the programming info), then you would have to hack the IP stack because those setups only use 1 IP address (the surfboard doesn't have an IP address as far as the host is concerned). HTH, Joel Gallun (former cable modem engineer)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ygawwdckqnh.fsf@severn.office.aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<541zvk3gx8.fsf@rrdjazz.nist.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5392,381320af383c6b6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5392,public X-Google-Thread: 11663c,381320af383c6b6 X-Google-Attributes: gid11663c,public From: snake@severn.office.aol.com (Joel K. Gallun) Subject: Re: asymmetric TCP/IP for 'simplex' cable modems? Date: 1998/03/30 Message-ID: <ygawwdckqnh.fsf@severn.office.aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 339183451 References: <541zvk3gx8.fsf@rrdjazz.nist.gov> X-Complaints-To: abuse@erols.com X-Trace: winter.news.erols.com 891280717 6117 207.96.122.8 (30 Mar 1998 17:58:37 GMT) Organization: Erol's Internet Services Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system,dc.org.linux-users