Article View: comp.os.linux.development.system
Article #132Re: Year 2000 and Linux
From: Casper H.S. Dik - Network Securi...
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 00:00
26 lines
1439 bytes
1439 bytes
[[ PLEASE DON'T SEND ME EMAIL COPIES OF POSTINGS ]] Wayne Schlitt <wayne@midwestcs.com> writes: >time_t must be signed, or things like difftime wont work correctly, >and gettimeofday returns -1 on an error. Why? Difftime doesn't return a time_t. It returns a double. gettimeofday doesn't return time. time() doesn't even return -1. Oops, mktime() returns -1. >Trying to fix the problems with switching from signed to unsigned >time_t isn't worth it. Just switch to a 64-bit time_t instead. Which might be a bit hard for on-disk formats and such. Casper -- Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems. Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may be fiction rather than truth.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<casper.889020671@uk-usenet.uk.sun.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<541zwjlq6y.fsf@rrdjazz.nist.gov> <x4sooyrjdb.fsf@backbone.midwestcs.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5392,988a9a95e4afdf07 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5392,public X-Google-Thread: 11663c,988a9a95e4afdf07 X-Google-Attributes: gid11663c,public From: Casper.Dik@Holland.Sun.Com (Casper H.S. Dik - Network Security Engineer) Subject: Re: Year 2000 and Linux Date: 1998/03/04 Message-ID: <casper.889020671@uk-usenet.uk.sun.com> X-Deja-AN: 330750400 References: <541zwjlq6y.fsf@rrdjazz.nist.gov> <x4sooyrjdb.fsf@backbone.midwestcs.com> Mail-Copies-To: never Organization: Sun Microsystems, Netherlands Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system,dc.org.linux-users