🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.linux.development.system
Article #42

Re: Q: 2GB file limit in stable linux - treatment in development linux

#42
From: Hans-Joachim Baader
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 00:00
30 lines
1493 bytes
In article <338b8bba.11371914@newshost.pcug.org.au>,
Bryan Palmer <bpalmer@pcug.org.au> wrote:

>All, am I correct in assuming that the 2GB file limit in the ext2 fs
>in Linux has been addressed in patch 2.1.9 (in file: fs/ext2/file.c
>date: 12 Nov 1996)?

No. I'm using a 2.5G partition since November, with kernel 2.0.x.
The size limit was removed much earlier.

>If corrected, what is the current file size limit in the 2.1.xx
>series?

I don't think this matters. I't clearly beyond the sizes of hard disks
for the next years...

>And what is the most "stable" development system (oxymorons aside)
>since the the removal of the 2GB limit?

I'm using 2.0.30 without problems. However if you think 2.0.30 is too
much of an alpha version, try 2.0.29.

hjb


-- 
    Uncle Ed's Rule of Thumb:  Never use your thumb for a rule.
    You'll either hit it with a hammer or get a splinter in it.
	 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5mdpqb$6c9@grumbeer.inka.de>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <338b8bba.11371914@newshost.pcug.org.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f5392,4c205d03a7b3d498
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5392,public
X-Google-Thread: 102983,4c205d03a7b3d498
X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public
From: hans@grumbeer.inka.de (Hans-Joachim Baader)
Subject: Re: Q: 2GB file limit in stable linux - treatment in development linux
Date: 1997/05/27
Message-ID: <5mdpqb$6c9@grumbeer.inka.de>
X-Deja-AN: 244526970
References: <338b8bba.11371914@newshost.pcug.org.au>
Organization: Anarchy & Chaos
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system,aus.computers.linux