Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #152Re: PCI compatibility of BusLogic's BT946C SCSI Adapter
From: Steven Hoke
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 00:16
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 00:16
16 lines
1190 bytes
1190 bytes
Leonard N. Zubkoff wrote: > > I know that on some DOS-based PCI Pentiums, rev C of the BT946C has > problems; revs D, E & F are supposedly o.k. > > Actually, I believe revs C - F are all identical in their PCI compatibility > assuming they have the latest firmware. The Rev C card had SCSI problems > with a few devices. I wasn't even aware that there was an F revision of the BT946C. Any idea what was changed on that from the E to the F revision? -- --==Steve==-- shoke@baldcom.net steven_hoke@msn.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<31421F46.3AFC@baldcom.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.lightlink.com!usenetReferences:
<Dn92LB.Cn@daneb.ping.de> <4h6air$l6h@caladan.restena.lu> <313C48EE.2CCF6F3A@tomserver.phys.ttu.edu> <4hslfi$90m@mirage.skypoint.com> <4hsr1p$5tp@kelewan.dandelion.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.lightlink.com!usenet From: Steven Hoke <shoke@baldcom.net> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: PCI compatibility of BusLogic's BT946C SCSI Adapter Date: Sat, 09 Mar 1996 19:16:06 -0500 Organization: ART MATRIX - LIGHTLINK Message-ID: <31421F46.3AFC@baldcom.net> References: <Dn92LB.Cn@daneb.ping.de> <4h6air$l6h@caladan.restena.lu> <313C48EE.2CCF6F3A@tomserver.phys.ttu.edu> <4hslfi$90m@mirage.skypoint.com> <4hsr1p$5tp@kelewan.dandelion.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.46.107 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)