Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #432Re: are socket7 and socket3 cpus different?
From: Richard Rudek
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 04:57
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 04:57
56 lines
3020 bytes
3020 bytes
On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 21:57:59 GMT, "Justin Thyme" <bogan@toranas.com> wrote: [snip] FYI: OverDrive(R) Processor Sockets For Intel486(TM) Processor-based Systems Sok # of et Pins Volts CPU OverDrive Processor* ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 169 5v 486SX BOXDX4ODP75 BOXDX4ODP100 486DX BOXDX4ODPR75 BOXDX4ODPR100 2 238 5v 486SX BOXDX4ODP75 BOXDX4ODP100 486DX BOXDX4ODPR75 BOXDX4ODPR100 486DX2 BOXPODP5V63 BOXPODP5V83 3 237 3/5v 486SX BOXDX4ODP75 BOXDX4ODP100 486DX BOXDX4ODPR75 BOXDX4ODPR100 486DX2 BOXPODP5V63 BOXPODP5V83 486DX4 No upgrade available 6 235 3v 486DX4 Future product >socket 3 - used for 486 CPU's >socket 4 - P1 60&66MHz versions >socket 5 - P1 75-100MHz (120 & 133MHz will normally also work, although they >aren't supposed to) Weren't expected too, I would have said. However, overdrives are supported: 125, 150, 166 and 180 MHz. I've also used the IDT/Centaur Winchip C6, in a socket-5. Still works, too :) >socket 7 - was introduced for P1's faster than 100MHz, but is backward >compatible for 75, 90 & 100MHz cpu's. Also used for K5, K6, 686 & M1 CPU's >from AMD & Cyrix. NB: not all socket 7's are created equal, just because it >is a socket 7, it may not have the correct voltages for your cpu. Most >earlier boards lacked the super low voltages (<3V) required by the later AMD >& Cyrix cpu's, and a lot of later boards didn't support the 50 & 60 MHz bus >speeds required by the early P1's. Yes, there were at least two specs supported by Intel. I (and many others) refered to them as: P54C and P55C. The P54C is single voltage, and P55C spilt or dual voltage. The later CPUs from the others also required a Super-Socket-7, which has 100MHz FSB, among other things. [snip] ___________________________________________ Richard Rudek. MicroDek, Sydney, Australia. �������������������������������������������
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3e1e4c7f.8440416@free.teranews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!reseller.nntpserver.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3e1dc9f8.19444750@news.nella.net.au> <3e1df061@news.comindico.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 102b32,4019fab8e15d0eb5 X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,4019fab8e15d0eb5 X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-09 22:21:24 PST From: x@invalid.xxx (Richard Rudek) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,aus.computers Subject: Re: are socket7 and socket3 cpus different? Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 04:57:15 GMT Message-ID: <3e1e4c7f.8440416@free.teranews.com> References: <3e1dc9f8.19444750@news.nella.net.au> <3e1df061@news.comindico.com.au> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 Lines: 56 X-Abuse-Report: Send abuse reports to abuse@teranews.com Organization: http://www.TeraNews.com - FREE NNTP Access Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!reseller.nntpserver.com!not-for-mail