Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #464GB Drives: Who's better: Seagate, Quantum, or Connor
From: John E. Davis
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:50
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 02:50
16 lines
1144 bytes
1144 bytes
On 24 Oct 1995 02:29:45 GMT, vp24njcb@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu <vp24njcb@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu> wrote: : >I'm looking for good reliable 4GB SCSI drive for my PC. : >What should I go for the Seagate Barracuda or Quantum Grand PRix? : >The Quantums appear significantly cheaper but are they better : >or as good as the Seagates? Better meaning more reliable. : : I haven't heard much good about the Barracudas. : They tend to die unexpectedly and often, from what I hear. : Just my opinion. Micron systems come with 4 Gig Connor drives. Are they any good? I changed the subject line to include the Connor drives. Thanks, --John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<46hk91$kmc@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!space.mit.edu!davisReferences:
<46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <46hj2p$r6t@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!space.mit.edu!davis From: davis@space.mit.edu (John E. Davis) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: 4GB Drives: Who's better: Seagate, Quantum, or Connor Date: 24 Oct 1995 02:50:09 GMT Organization: Center for Space Research Message-ID: <46hk91$kmc@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> References: <46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <46hj2p$r6t@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> Reply-To: davis@space.mit.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: wiwaxia.mit.edu X-Newsreader: slrn (0.8.0)