Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #68Re: 4GB Drives: Who's better Seagate or Quantum
From: Paul Rubin
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 00:18
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 00:18
29 lines
1955 bytes
1955 bytes
In article <46s0so$1uh@rn.com>, Larry D Snyder <larry@rn.com> wrote: >>But seriously, if you are unwilling to devote the time and $$$ to do the >>proper cooling then definitely avoid Barracudas. But if you give them the >>proper care, feeding, and love they will serve you long, well, and fast. > >But should one need to go to such extremes with such an expensive >drive? I don't think so. A Ferrari is an expensive car, but it has much higher maintenance demands than a Toyota. The ST15150 was designed to provide bleeding edge performance (for its time); ease of installation was never one of its goals and it was sold for servers, not desktop machines. It is more like a Ferrari than a Toyota. It's expensive and you have to pamper it with forced air cooling on both the top and bottom. If you don't want to do that, you bought the wrong drive. Seagate's 4 GB "desktop" drive is the Hawk 4 (ST15230), which is slightly slower and cheaper, and runs cooler because of its lower spindle speed of 5400 rpm instead of 7200. I sold my ST15150 recently because I didn't want to deal with cooling it, and I'll probably get an ST15230 soon. >We've gone through 5 of the 15150N's in >the last 5 months on one of our news machines at the office -- and >in each case Seagate was at least good about getting a replacement >our via next day air -- but the hassles of bring the machine down >gets one depressed... Were you cooling them properly?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<phrDH6ouJ.4Dz@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!phrReferences:
<46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <46hj2p$r6t@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <46jkou$6an@panix.com> <46s0so$1uh@rn.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.periphs.scsi Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!phr From: phr@netcom.com (Paul Rubin) Subject: Re: 4GB Drives: Who's better Seagate or Quantum Message-ID: <phrDH6ouJ.4Dz@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) References: <46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <46hj2p$r6t@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <46jkou$6an@panix.com> <46s0so$1uh@rn.com> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 00:18:18 GMT Sender: phr@netcom9.netcom.com