Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #76Re: 4GB Drives: Who's better Seagate or Quantum
From: Richard Piper
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 03:21
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 03:21
31 lines
2270 bytes
2270 bytes
jrd@cc.usu.edu (Joe Doupnik) wrote:
>In article <470pc4$b8k@panix.com>, fishman@panix.com (Harvey Fishman) writes:
>> In <phrDH6ouJ.4Dz@netcom.com> phr@netcom.com (Paul Rubin) says
>>
>>> Seagate's 4 GB "desktop" drive is the Hawk 4 (ST15230), which is
>>> slightly slower and cheaper, and runs cooler because of its lower
>>> spindle speed of 5400 rpm instead of 7200. I sold my ST15150
>>> recently because I didn't want to deal with cooling it, and I'll
>>> probably get an ST15230 soon.
>>
>> The capability that generally causes a drive to use lots of power and thus
>> run hot is NOT spindle speed. It is track-to-track seek. It takes POWER
>> to accelerate the mass of the head assembly from rest and to decelerate it
>> back to rest and do both FAST. Keeping something running at almost any
>> constant speed is trivial.
>
> May I point out something obvious? Such drives run hot even when
Onother consideration with these large drives, unless they are on a server, is that
they are very loud. I had the 4GB Quantum running under linux for a few weeks. I although
it certainly runs hotter than a normal drive, my main concern was the high pitched wine
it generated. In the end I had to trade it in for two smaller seagates (1GB hawks) which
are a little quieter. It was almost impossible to do any work in the same room, at least
that was my impression.
--
Richard Piper Email: rpiper@julian.uwo.ca
Phone: Work 519-6858300 Ext 8991
Page: 519-6453497
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<471gca$qca@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newshost.uwo.ca!usenetReferences:
<46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <470pc4$b8k@panix.com> <1995Oct29.144214.65295@cc.usu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!newshost.uwo.ca!usenet From: Richard Piper <rpiper> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: 4GB Drives: Who's better Seagate or Quantum Date: 30 Oct 1995 03:21:46 GMT Organization: The University of Western Ontario, London, Ont. Canada Message-ID: <471gca$qca@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> References: <46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <470pc4$b8k@panix.com> <1995Oct29.144214.65295@cc.usu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: critcare.vichosp.london.on.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.12 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.5 i486) X-URL: news:1995Oct29.144214.65295@cc.usu.edu