Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #819Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
From: Tim
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 04:02
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 04:02
16 lines
1795 bytes
1795 bytes
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 19:05:51 +0100, andrew <andrew@killspam.gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >I'm not trying to rub salt into your wounds, but anyone thinking of >buying a P4 should first read the article in the link below and then ask >themselves if they really want a P4. Let's just say that the article is >not very complimentary to the P4 or Intel. > >http://www.emulators.com/docs/pentium_1.htm I think you need to read that article in the context of TODAY! A year or two ago, P4s got crushed by Athlons. Today, the fastest P4s beat the fastest Athlons. The only thing still in the Athlon's favor is its price:performance ratio.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<u3ctguk8tccbs7vfohtof91cl0qa53rq4m@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.alt.net!usenetReferences:
<3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <bJBrtJA$H4C9Ew$t@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-17 21:02:29 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.alt.net!usenet From: Tim <bodysurf@> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex Subject: Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible? Date: 18 Jun 2002 04:02:29 GMT Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - http://www.altopia.com Lines: 17 Message-ID: <u3ctguk8tccbs7vfohtof91cl0qa53rq4m@4ax.com> References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <bJBrtJA$H4C9Ew$t@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk> Reply-To: POBOX.COM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564