Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #838Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
From: Bitey
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 02:43
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 02:43
18 lines
2413 bytes
2413 bytes
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:33:42 -0400, "B. Joshua Rosen" <bjrosen@polybus.com> wrote: >In <95mvgukpc993tcite11gntmdrcndi8iiio@4ax.com>, Bitey wrote: > > >> didn't the 8080/8086 had a shared data/memory bus, now thats a wondeful >> design decsion...it would be fine for some embedded application....but >> not as the CPU in a PC >> > >All microprocessors of that time had shared memory/data buses. A really >big package had 64 pins, there might have been some 80 pin packages (my >memory is a bt fuzzy) but that was it. 6502's and 6800, 68000 all had separate ones I heard when IBM was designing thier first PC they were considering using a 68000, but went for the intel one because it was cheaper
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<qkrvgus7c0p5gg5npl900po21kai1c7n62@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.optus.net.au!optus!snewsf0.syd.ops.aspac.uu.net!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <MPG.1776a491ca74b5bf989edd@powernews.libero.it> <1fdyury.16lgkkf1d22zw9N%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet> <x5it4h2d58.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz> <1fdyxzl.1eky32lcx38cvN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet> <x58z5c3oop.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz> <95mvgukpc993tcite11gntmdrcndi8iiio@4ax.com> <pan.2002.06.19.02.33.36.943472.20068@polybus.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-18 19:42:52 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.optus.net.au!optus!snewsf0.syd.ops.aspac.uu.net!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail From: Bitey <no@spamless.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex Subject: Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible? Message-ID: <qkrvgus7c0p5gg5npl900po21kai1c7n62@4ax.com> References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <MPG.1776a491ca74b5bf989edd@powernews.libero.it> <1fdyury.16lgkkf1d22zw9N%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet> <x5it4h2d58.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz> <1fdyxzl.1eky32lcx38cvN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet> <x58z5c3oop.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz> <95mvgukpc993tcite11gntmdrcndi8iiio@4ax.com> <pan.2002.06.19.02.33.36.943472.20068@polybus.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: srs9-116-22.wire.wiredcity.com.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 1024454571 203.161.116.22 (Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:42:51 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:42:51 EST Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia Distribution: world Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:43:21 +0800