Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?

Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware

Article #846

Back to comp.os.linux.hardware Previous Next

#846

From: Toon Moene
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 18:51

24 lines
2584 bytes

"Eric P. McCoy" wrote:

> Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> writes:

> > FreeBSD (or so I heard during the Linux BoF headed by Linus T. himself).

> FreeBSD is not a Linux distribution.  Also, if Linus said that, he was
> either talking about an unreleased version or he was talking out of
> his ass:

No, I said I *heard* it during the Linux BoF (at USENIX), not that Linus
said it.

It was put forward by one of the FreeBSD developers on the front row (I
couldn't see who it was, because I was back somewhere in the middle of
the audience).

I suppose he knew what he was talking about.

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3D122431.4F2D9002@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.wxs.nl!news2.euro.net!transit.news.xs4all.nl!195.129.110.18.MISMATCH!bnewspeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewsifeed00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspost00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.nl.uu.net!not-for-mail

References:

<3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com> <3D10EF45.703B0F1@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87lm997vl0.fsf@katmai.local>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,b32aa620bb2987b1
X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-20 11:51:13 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.wxs.nl!news2.euro.net!transit.news.xs4all.nl!195.129.110.18.MISMATCH!bnewspeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewsifeed00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspost00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.nl.uu.net!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3D122431.4F2D9002@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 20:51:29 +0200
From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex,comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: P4  vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com> <3D10EF45.703B0F1@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87lm997vl0.fsf@katmai.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.moene.indiv.nluug.nl
X-Trace: 1024599069 news.nl.uu.net 220 195.109.255.217
X-Complaints-To: abuse@nl.uu.net

Reply to Parent Message