🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #850

Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?

#850
From: Toon Moene
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 19:47
20 lines
2439 bytes
"Eric P. McCoy" wrote:

> Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> writes:

> > It was put forward by one of the FreeBSD developers on the front row (I
> > couldn't see who it was, because I was back somewhere in the middle of
> > the audience).
> > I suppose he knew what he was talking about.
> 
> He must have been talking about an unreleased version, then. 

Would not surprise me.  Linus was addressing things happening in 2.5.x,
so 
it could well be about an unreleased version of FreeBSD.

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3D1382E0.6B261C98@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.online.be!bnewspeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspost00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.nl.uu.net!not-for-mail
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com> <3D10EF45.703B0F1@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87lm997vl0.fsf@katmai.local> <3D122431.4F2D9002@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87hejwmv9j.fsf@katmai.local>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,b32aa620bb2987b1
X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-21 12:48:09 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.online.be!bnewspeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspost00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.nl.uu.net!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3D1382E0.6B261C98@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 21:47:44 +0200
From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex,comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: P4  vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com> <3D10EF45.703B0F1@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87lm997vl0.fsf@katmai.local> <3D122431.4F2D9002@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87hejwmv9j.fsf@katmai.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.moene.indiv.nluug.nl
X-Trace: 1024688844 news.nl.uu.net 225 195.109.255.217
X-Complaints-To: abuse@nl.uu.net