Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #850Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
From: Toon Moene
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 19:47
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 19:47
20 lines
2439 bytes
2439 bytes
"Eric P. McCoy" wrote: > Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> writes: > > It was put forward by one of the FreeBSD developers on the front row (I > > couldn't see who it was, because I was back somewhere in the middle of > > the audience). > > I suppose he knew what he was talking about. > > He must have been talking about an unreleased version, then. Would not surprise me. Linus was addressing things happening in 2.5.x, so it could well be about an unreleased version of FreeBSD. -- Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3D1382E0.6B261C98@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.online.be!bnewspeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspost00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.nl.uu.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com> <3D10EF45.703B0F1@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87lm997vl0.fsf@katmai.local> <3D122431.4F2D9002@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87hejwmv9j.fsf@katmai.local>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,b32aa620bb2987b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-21 12:48:09 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.online.be!bnewspeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!bnewspost00.bru.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.nl.uu.net!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3D1382E0.6B261C98@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 21:47:44 +0200 From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex,comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible? References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <cVYO8.93284$pw3.4355@sccrnsc03> <3D0C8986.5090104@nospam.com> <3D10EF45.703B0F1@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87lm997vl0.fsf@katmai.local> <3D122431.4F2D9002@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <87hejwmv9j.fsf@katmai.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: mail.moene.indiv.nluug.nl X-Trace: 1024688844 news.nl.uu.net 225 195.109.255.217 X-Complaints-To: abuse@nl.uu.net