🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #852

Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?

#852
From: Richard E. Hawkins
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 21:09
18 lines
2006 bytes
In article <x5ptyoy413.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz>,
David Kastrup  <David.Kastrup@t-online.de> wrote:

>It is an 8080 with lots of stuff kludged on.  Its design is messy,
>but it does not offer anything less than an 8080 does.  There is no
>reason to be using an 8080 instead of a Z80 that I would know of.

Heathkit used an undocumented 8080 instruction in one of its games
(chess?), which meant something else on a Z80.  However, you could patch
the equivelent Z80 program into the binary and the game worked.

hawk

-- 
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics    /"\   ASCII ribbon campaign
dochawk@psu.edu  Smeal 178  (814) 375-4700      \ /   against HTML mail
These opinions will not be those of              X    and postings. 
Penn State until it pays my retainer.           / \   
Technical Details
Message-ID: <af04mn$22t0@r02n01.cac.psu.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news3.cac.psu.edu!not-for-mail
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <x57kkw2101.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz> <1fdzalw.1bd5trjb4vpaxN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet> <x5ptyoy413.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-21 14:17:22 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news3.cac.psu.edu!not-for-mail
From: hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu (Richard E. Hawkins)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: P4  vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
Date: 21 Jun 2002 21:09:43 GMT
Organization: Penn State University, Center for Academic Computing
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <af04mn$22t0@r02n01.cac.psu.edu>
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <x57kkw2101.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz> <1fdzalw.1bd5trjb4vpaxN%real-address-in-sig@flur.bltigibbet> <x5ptyoy413.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fac13.ds.psu.edu
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
Originator: hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu (Richard E. Hawkins)