Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #857Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
From: David Kastrup
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 23:18
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 23:18
26 lines
2786 bytes
2786 bytes
"Jack" <jack@norealaddy.net> writes: > "andrew" <andrew@killspam.gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message > news:bJBrtJA$H4C9Ew$t@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk... > : > : I'm not trying to rub salt into your wounds, but anyone thinking of > : buying a P4 should first read the article in the link below and then ask > : themselves if they really want a P4. Let's just say that the article is > : not very complimentary to the P4 or Intel. > : > : http://www.emulators.com/docs/pentium_1.htm > > That was a very interesting article...very eye opening. I learned a > lot. So can we surmise that people who buy P4's (in lieu of > Athon's, or even PIII's !) are either clueless dolts buying with > the "huddled masses" mentality, or that Intel's marketing machine is > really **that** good? Or that people buying a P4 have the attention span necessary for reading the given web article through to the last installment which says that recent versions of P4 beat the Athlons in performance, their design problems notwithstanding. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum Email: David.Kastrup@t-online.de
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<x5ofecf7vi.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!colt.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm01.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <bJBrtJA$H4C9Ew$t@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk> <aeghpc$42k$1@reader2.wnet>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public
X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-15 16:28:07 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!colt.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm01.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: David Kastrup <David.Kastrup@t-online.de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
Date: 16 Jun 2002 01:18:57 +0200
Organization: T-Online
Lines: 26
Sender: dak@tupik.goethe.zz
Message-ID: <x5ofecf7vi.fsf@tupik.goethe.zz>
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <bJBrtJA$H4C9Ew$t@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk> <aeghpc$42k$1@reader2.wnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1024183212 02 7642 fToQba3SS5AKVX 020615 23:20:12
X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com
X-Sender: 520018396234-0001@t-dialin.net
X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6,xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl
\!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN;i";/yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^
Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50