🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #859

Re: P4 vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?

#859
From: Craig McCluskey
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 02:05
17 lines
2079 bytes
andrew wrote:
> 
> I'm not trying to rub salt into your wounds, but anyone thinking of
> buying a P4 should first read the article in the link below and then ask
> themselves if they really want a P4.  Let's just say that the article is
> not very complimentary to the P4 or Intel.
> 
> http://www.emulators.com/docs/pentium_1.htm

The latest take on the situation is at
http://www.emulators.com/pentium4.htm and gives links to all of the
installments, including installment 1 linked above. The only installment
I have been able to view, however, is #2. Clicking on the other links
gets, "Transfer interrupted," messages.


Craig
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3D0BF254.C6A0A3FF@host.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cyclone.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <bJBrtJA$H4C9Ew$t@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9e16,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b32,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b32,public
X-Google-Thread: 1045b9,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1045b9,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,ea3300a83f1f851c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-15 19:15:03 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cyclone.bc.net!arclight.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
From: Craig McCluskey <user@host.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,gnu.gcc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: P4  vs Athlon for Linux latexing, is gcc-2.95 responsible?
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 21:05:08 -0500
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin; Austin, Texas
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <3D0BF254.C6A0A3FF@host.com>
References: <3D0B57CB.5060406@nospam.com> <bJBrtJA$H4C9Ew$t@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-53-1.ots.utexas.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu 1024193083 19902 128.83.57.97 (16 Jun 2002 02:04:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@utexas.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 02:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-34 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en