Article View: comp.os.linux.hardware
Article #86Re: 4GB Drives: Who's better Seagate or Quantum
From: Chris Pirih
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 1995 10:59
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 1995 10:59
16 lines
1362 bytes
1362 bytes
fishman@panix.com (Harvey Fishman) wrote: | The capability that generally causes a drive to use lots of power and thus | run hot is NOT spindle speed. It is track-to-track seek. It takes POWER | to accelerate the mass of the head assembly from rest and to decelerate it | back to rest and do both FAST. Do you have any evidence that seeking generates more heat than spinning? Your reasoning seems sound, but my informal "finger testing" contradicts it. All the disk drives I have are the same temperature whether they're idle or in heavy use, and among contemporaries the faster the spindle rate the higher the temperature. (The older 5" 3600 RPM drives are hotter, but that's probably because the platters are larger and heavier, and put more weight on the spindle bearings.) --- chris
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<omlet.309a043fwn@news1.wolfe.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ratty.wolfe.net!usenetReferences:
<46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <46hj2p$r6t@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <46jkou$6an@panix.com> <46s0so$1uh@rn.com> <phrDH6ouJ.4Dz@netcom.com> <470pc4$b8k@panix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ratty.wolfe.net!usenet From: proverbs@wolfenet.com (Chris Pirih) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: 4GB Drives: Who's better Seagate or Quantum Date: 3 Nov 1995 03:59:59 PDT Organization: The International House O' Cheese, Seattle USA Message-ID: <omlet.309a043fwn@news1.wolfe.net> References: <46hcd8$t18@elaine16.Stanford.EDU> <46hj2p$r6t@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <46jkou$6an@panix.com> <46s0so$1uh@rn.com> <phrDH6ouJ.4Dz@netcom.com> <470pc4$b8k@panix.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sea-ts1-p32.wolfenet.com