Article View: comp.os.linux.misc
Article #612Re: Which Vesion of linux?
From: http://www.computel.com/~amorphi...
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 00:00
169 lines
7780 bytes
7780 bytes
Whoah! Thanks a lot, Tony! Now I have something to do on a good , sunny weekend :-) Muchly appreciated, > amorphiz@cns.computel.com () writes: > > >Hello people :-) > > G'day. > > >I am currently seeking installing linux on my dos/win machine, and would > > *EXCELLENT* choice! I salute you on your taste! :-) > > >like some advice on which version of linux can be recommended, what > >some advantages are of different versions, like caldera vs. slackware,etc. > > >If you there is a URL or another source , which has a comparison or such > >info about various linux versions, I'd appreciate a pointer to it. > > Yep, there sure is. > > ftp://ftp.monash.edu.au/pub/linux/doc/howto/Distribution-HOWTO > ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/doc/howto/Distribution-HOWTO > > -rw-r--r-- 1 4534 system 65330 Aug 20 19:48 Distribution-HOWTO > > >Posting here, would benefit others, I'd suppose, so I am here, reading > >from now on :> > > FWIW, here are my personal thoughts. > > The distributions are different. Think carefully about what you want. > > I recently (3 months ago) finally installed linux and went with > Slackware (2.2 then upgraded, sort of, to 2.3). I have no complaints > about the install - with the howto/faq in hand it went as smooth as > silk. The basic (`a' series) system it gave me was good, setting > everything up just fine for me and I had a good basic working > (stripped down) unix system. It has a telix-like comms program with > Zmodem that allowed me to download what I needed from the rest of the > distribution disks. (Once you have installed the `a' series you don't > need dog^Hz any more). > > But I now wish that I had left it at that. > > The rest of the disk series comprises of a range of applications in > "sets" with things like editors, X windows, compilers and so on. I > regret using the distributions because they gave me heaps of junk that > I don't need and/or don't know what they are for - I now need to > carefully remove a lot of this. > > Too often (especially in the networking `n' series) I have found that > programs have been *compiled* with options that I didn't like or > didn't suit my purpose (nn, mailx and sendmail being major examples). > > Slackware also gives you preformatted man pages, not the full nroff > source - which is a bummer if you want to nicely print them with a man > -t command). I've found collections of many of the original man > pages, but it remains a source of irritation for me. > > Slackware also did not attempt to set up any functional printing > facilities with /etc/printcap filters installed and ready to configure > and go... I had to go get everthing I needed myself. > > Also, the distributions carry not-quite-the latest versions of many > things. Perhaps that's not a big deal, especially if you end up with > a stable kernel and a configuration that suites your needs. > > Examples are the linux kernel itself, the gcc compiler, and odd things > like ppp (networking), less etc. > > 1. ELF > > More relevant to the present situation, there is currently a move from > the current "a.out" shared library format, to something called ELF > (read the faq about it). I would strongly advise anyone to go with it > right from the start if they can (and they now can!), as converting an > a.out system to ELF requires very careful treading in delicate areas, > recompiling just about everything you have, and having two sets of > shared libraries on your system. > > There is a "beta" ELF Slackware distribution somewhere, and from all > reports it is quite stable. Offhand, I don't know where to find it > (it would be easy to track it down). > > 2. The linux KERNEL > > Stay away from the Linux 1.3.x development kernels (now at 1.3.21). > They are unstable, believe me, on the bleeding edge of > experimentation and beta-testing. > > The latest stable linux kernel is 1.2.13 (probably a 1.2.14 soon, > according to Linus in the kernel mailing list). I've had an uptime > here with it for over 12 days now with no problems; best any of the > 1.3.x versions did here was perhaps a day and a half. > > Slackware 2.2 has the 1.2.3 kernel, Slack 2.3 has the 1.2.8 kernel. > While others have had more luck, both of them frequently crashed and > burned here as well. So go for the latest 1.2.x kernel (unless 1.4.x > starts to happen - then get that). > > The linux kernels, and the upgrade patches, can be fetched from: > > ftp.funet.fi :: /pub/OS/Linux/PEOPLE/Linus/ > > 3. GCC > > Both of these Slackware versions come with gcc v2.6.3, and it known to > be buggy. The latest version is 2.7.0, and it appears to be a lot > better. Get the linux binary distribution (careful! - a.out or ELF!!) > and install that instead of the `d' Slackware series. The bugs in it > haven't hit me yet (they are obscure"ish"), but it just means that I > will have to upgrade it (manually). > > 4. Other > > Not to mention the infamous "daily cron email to root" error in > /usr/bin/updatedb ! :-) > > There are a number of little problems like this with Slack2.2, some > fixed in Slack2.3 (not this one though:). Some of this is documented > (with fixes) at ftp.netcom.com/pub/ze/zenon/linux/tmp/. > > Perl in Slack 2.2 is a 4.x version, but 2.3 has perl5. Perl 5.x would > be the one to have. > > > Slackware is ok, but look at others, and be choosy about what you need > to install after all the basics. Be prepared for things like ELF and > upgrade paths (it's not easy to upgrade each Slackware distribution - > I believe the Devian dist. does this better). > > But don't let this put you off getting it! The wonderful thing about > linux is that you have the freedom to set up your system the way you > want. The distributions are a great start, so go with one of them - > initially anyway. > > Most of all - HAVE FUN! And good luck. > > >Thanks very much! > > You're welcome. > > Disclaimer: I don't regret using Slackware, and I'm not out to bash > it. I would do things differently if I ever have to set up another > system, but Slackware was a great place to start and I learned heaps > using it. > > Cheers > Tony > _____________________________________________________________________ > /_ \ Tony Nugent Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia\___ > \@)_\ Email: T.Nugent@sct.gu.edu.au tnugent@gucis.cit.gu.edu.au \(@\ > \__________________________________________________________________\_/ > New Opcode: RRT Rewind and Rip Tape > -=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Email: amorphiz@computel.com * amorphiz@aol.com * amorphis@phantom.com URL: http://www.computel.com/~amorphiz Talk: root@amorphiz.computel.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.BSD/.3.91.950829224440.4037B-100000@cns.computel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<41u3k5$6oi@cns.computel.com> <199508300114.LAA14420@kraken.itc.gu.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1103af,23d64a30e55e5cd X-Google-Attributes: gid1103af,public X-Google-Thread: f9382,23d64a30e55e5cd X-Google-Attributes: gidf9382,public X-Google-Thread: 102983,23d64a30e55e5cd X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public From: "http://www.computel.com/~amorphiz" <amorphiz@computel.com> Subject: Re: Which Vesion of linux? Date: 1995/08/29 Message-ID: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.950829224440.4037B-100000@cns.computel.com> X-Deja-AN: 109089620 references: <41u3k5$6oi@cns.computel.com> <199508300114.LAA14420@kraken.itc.gu.edu.au> content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII organization: Computel Network Services mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux