🚀 go-pugleaf

thanks for information.....





On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:39:31 +1100, Dean Thompson
<Dean.Thompson@csse.monash.edu.au> wrote:

>
>Hi!,
>
>> im testing Bind 9.2 with W2k-Active Directory... after hours of work
>> the bind server runs and the W2k server works also.
>> 
>> a look at the zone file of the domain shows......
>> 
>> $origin.
>> test.com        in SOA ........
>>                 (......
>>                 ....)
>>                 NS ns1.test.com.
>> 
>>          .... that the w2k server has created an A record:
>> 
>> $TTL 600        ; 10 minutes
>>                 A       172.16.10.10
>> 
>> my question:
>> 
>> if i take a real domainname (for internal and maybe also for
>> external use) -> is it a good idea to create the
>> w2k domain at the top or
>> is it better to create a subdomain (ex:  win.test.com)
>> to put all the server and clients into the subdomain.
>
>By domain are you refering to the Windows concept of a domain or are you
>talking about the domain of the company.  In theory, you would have it as the
>top of your domain.  For example:
>
>If you have a company with a domain name of "mycompany.com" and the domain
>name is "mycompany", then you want the AD to register with your DNS server at
>the top level.  That is: "myserver.mycompany.com" should be the intended
>domain name structure you are looking for.  If you are creating a Win server
>which forms a sub-domain within your company like "marketing", then you will
>want to look at creating a subdomain rather than placing things at the top
>level.
>
>See ya
>
>Dean Thompson