🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 01 Aug 1998, Graham Daveney wrote:
>Hi There,
>
>I cannot get ppp working with kernel 2.1.110.
>
>ppp dialup works perfectly with kernel 2.0.35.
>
>I am using Slackware 3.5 on a dual PPro computer with SMP.
>
>If I go pppd -v from the command line I get the following.
>
>pppd version 2.3 patch level 5
>
>Which is what is needed for the later kernels.
>
>Looking at dmesg for the boot of the 2.1.110 kernel here is something that I
>think is relevant.
>
>Aug  2 07:27:56 daveney kernel: IP-Config: Incomplete network configuration
>                                           information. 
>
>When I type "ppp-go" I get the following message in the /var/adm/messages file.
>
>Aug  2 07:30:29 daveney modprobe: can't locate module ppp0
>
>This is strange because I have compiled ppp into the kernel, not as a module.
>
>I will also get the following messages in the /var/adm/syslog file.
>
>Aug  2 07:30:29 daveney pppd[210]: Failed to open /dev/modem:
>                                   Device or resource busy(16)
>Aug  2 07:30:29 daveney pppd[210]: This system lacks kernel support for PPP.
>                                   This could be because the PPP kernel module
>                                   is not loaded, or because the kernel is not
>                                   configured for PPP.  See the README.linux
>                                   file in the ppp-2.3.5 distribution. 
>
>The interesting thing is that as far as I can see the ppp scripts reference
>only /dev/modem. Here are the permissions for /dev/modem and /dev/cua1.
>
>lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root            9 Jul 25 21:56 /dev/modem -> /dev/cua1
>crwxr-xr-x   1 uucp     uucp       5,  65 Aug  2 07:26 /dev/cua1
>
>Another interesting thing is that if I run "make kernel" from the 
>/usr/src/ppp-2.3.5 directory I get the following.
>
>[snip]
>
>Installing into kernel version 2.1.110 in /usr/src/linux
>
>/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/bsd_comp.c is newer than bsd_comp.c, skipping
>/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/ppp_deflate.c is newer than ppp_deflate.c, skipping
>/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/zlib.c is newer than zlib.c, skipping
>/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/zlib.h is newer than zlib.h, skipping
>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/if_ppp.h is newer than if_ppp.h, skipping
>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/if_pppvar.h is newer than if_pppvar.h, skipping
>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/ppp-comp.h is newer than ppp-comp.h, skipping
>/usr/src/linux/include/linux/ppp_defs.h is newer than ppp_defs.h, skipping
>/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/ppp.c is newer than ppp.c, skipping
>Adding BSD compression module to drivers makefile...(already there--skipping)
>Adding Deflate compression module to drivers makefile...(already there--skipping)
>Kernel driver files installation done.
>
>
>This tells me that all is as it should be with the ppp code in the kernel.
>
>
>The dmesg from the 2.1.110 kernel tells me the following.
>
>[snip]
>
>PPP: version 2.3.3 (demand dialling)
>TCP compression code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
>PPP line discipline registered.
>SLIP: version 0.8.4-NET3.019-NEWTTY (dynamic channels, max=256) (6 bit encapsulation enabled).
>CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California.
>SLIP linefill/keepalive option.
>ne.c:v1.10 9/23/94 Donald Becker (becker@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov)
>NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x300: 00 00 e8 1c b0 a8
>eth0: NE2000 found at 0x300, using IRQ 10.
>IP-Config: Incomplete network configuration information.
>
>[snip]
>
>
>Any ideas much appreciated. I'd like to run the 2.1.110 kernel as the DMA makes
>the disk access just so much faster.
>
>
>Graham

I'm going to follow this one because I have a similar problem...except I actuall
get in my system logs 

pppd upap authentacated
pppd local ip=207.243.124.60
pppd remote ip=207.243.124.5
pppd conection terminated

all within 2 seconds


all works fine with 2.0.35


--
tng
**********************************************************
when windows version 1.0 was released, a new joke was born
"how do you make windows crash...type win and press enter"
years later, this system has the monopoly and finally get 
the name it desirves...
Windows 98 (pound weakling)
**********************************************************