🚀 go-pugleaf

Steve Baker wrote:
> 
...
> 
> The numbers 192.168.200.0-255 are defined in an RFC as numbers that
> are not present as 'real' addresses on the internet, ie. for use
> in situations like yours.  You can of course use any numbers you like,
> but if you connect to the internet later any IP addresses that conflict
> with yours will be unreachable.

I believe that sane ISPs actually reject all routing information
that comes from their dial-up clients -- precisely because of the
that problem.

-- 
Dimitri
-------
sig:
 "By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meet
the
  definition of a telephone fax machine.  By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is
unlawful
  to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment. By
Sec.227(b)(3)(C),
  a violation of the aforementioned Section is punishable by action to
recover
  actual monetary loss, or $500, whichever is greater, for each
violation."
(Solicited advertisements <huh?> and other such can be sent to 
  emaziuk at curtin.edu.au)