Article View: comp.os.linux.networking
Article #540Re: ppp woes
From: David Killick
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 11:45
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 11:45
39 lines
3282 bytes
3282 bytes
I recently set up PPP on my father's computer, and discovered that the initialisation string for his modem is nothing like mine, which caused all sorts of errors. Anyway, I determined the correct string by reading through either Autorun.inf or some obviously named file on the windows driver CD, can;t remember what the keyword was, and he took the disk away. Anyway, might be worth a look. Bob Wightman wrote: > Key words for search engines: > ppp, pppd, LCP Echo failure, modem init string > > Thanks for the info guys. I now have an up and running ppp connection to > my ISP. > > The problem was the init string for my modem. AT&F works fine but I > shall have to check for the most suitable string for my particular modem > to get the best performance. I also changed the asyncmap line in > /etc/ppp/options line to 0 (zero). > > The command that I succeeded with was: > > /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/ttyS1 115200 connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v '' AT OK > ATDT1234567890 CONNECT '\d\c'" > > Which came from Bill Unruh's web page on PPP. Part of my problem was > that I was following those instructions when I came across a script > written specifically for my ISP and somehow the two got crossed. Mea > culpa. Somewhat confusingly the chat.script that the ISP specific script > used did use AT&F whereas the chat.script file for the above command did > not. The asyncmap 200a00 line came from the ISP specific script. > > Somewhat bizarrely I have set kppp up with the same parameters as far as > I can tell and ppp doesn't like it, but that is another problem to > solve. Most probably there is a config file somewhere that kppp is using > without me knowing about or without kppp telling me it is using. > > Thanks again.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3C9C6AC6.80807@metalicom.nospam.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!colt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!metalicom.demon.co.uk!bearty.larkhall.bath.uk!nobodyReferences:
<YqW2uQCBf7l8EwxT@pattinson.demon.co.uk> <xoavelifpgpb.fsf@sun.com> <NB0m8.3659$s8.322586@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <3C98DCB7.8080603@metalicom.nospam.demon.co.uk> <2yy9oVAbQDn8EwEQ@pattinson.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10669a,e6f14bb1f758c59e X-Google-Attributes: gid10669a,public X-Google-Thread: 108f6a,e6f14bb1f758c59e X-Google-Attributes: gid108f6a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-24 14:02:10 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!colt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!metalicom.demon.co.uk!bearty.larkhall.bath.uk!nobody From: David Killick <david.killick@metalicom.nospam.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking,demon.ip.support.unix Subject: Re: ppp woes Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 11:45:10 +0000 Organization: British Metalicom Message-ID: <3C9C6AC6.80807@metalicom.nospam.demon.co.uk> References: <YqW2uQCBf7l8EwxT@pattinson.demon.co.uk> <xoavelifpgpb.fsf@sun.com> <NB0m8.3659$s8.322586@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <3C98DCB7.8080603@metalicom.nospam.demon.co.uk> <2yy9oVAbQDn8EwEQ@pattinson.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: David.Killick@metalicom.nospam.demon.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Host: metalicom.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: metalicom.demon.co.uk:194.222.97.187 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1017007313 nnrp-10:2379 NO-IDENT metalicom.demon.co.uk:194.222.97.187 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010610 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 40