USR Robotics Basic Rate ISDN Card?

Thread View: comp.os.linux.networking

2 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

2 total messages Started by John Grana Sat, 27 Jan 1996 17:46

#53

Author: John Grana
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 17:46

21 lines
1276 bytes

I was at the USR Robotics web page and noticed thay have a nice looking
Basic Rate ISDN card for PC's. I have been looking at the Mot. BitSurfer
and liked the idea that is appeared like a "real fast Hayes compat. modem"
by supporting the AT command set.

I can't find any mention of Hayes AT command set support with the Robotics
card. It does talk about various driver support. Under Unix it says
"a third party".

So, has anyone tried running this card under Linux? Is there any
plans for driver support?

Thanks
John Grana
jjg@pt.com

-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
|John Grana, Performance Technologies Incorporated		jjg@pt.com|
|315 Science Parkway, Rochester, New York 14620           uupsi!ptsys1!jjg|
|Phone: (716) 256-0200   Fax: (716) 256-0791                              |

Re: USR Robotics Basic Rate ISDN Card?

#54

Author: Bryan J. Phillippe
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 07:30

32 lines
2084 bytes

On Sat, 27 Jan 1996, John Grana wrote:

> I was at the USR Robotics web page and noticed thay have a nice looking
> Basic Rate ISDN card for PC's. I have been looking at the Mot. BitSurfer
> and liked the idea that is appeared like a "real fast Hayes compat. modem"
> by supporting the AT command set.

One thing that rocks about the USR is that there is an internal model. 
Internal meaning it uses it's own serial port.. meaning it's not bounded
by the 115.2k serial port rate for PC's.  I believe that it does have the
standard USR AT command set (Hayes), and functions as a regular V.34+
33.6k analog modem as well.  We had some brochures at work and this all
comes from memory (if it serves).. 

> I can't find any mention of Hayes AT command set support with the Robotics
> card. It does talk about various driver support. Under Unix it says
> "a third party".

Right... I wondered what they're talking about, as well.

> So, has anyone tried running this card under Linux? Is there any
> plans for driver support?
> 

Ditto.  Anyone out there flying this bird?  I'd also be interested in 
some Linux results, as well.  Since Linux is the only operating system 
that matters, DOG/LOSE/LOSE'95 results are irrelevant (no offense to 
users of these proprietory systems intended).

Bryan J. Phillippe       mailto:bryan@eternity.aa.net
Kickin' it since 1.1.59  http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~bryanxms
/* Do not distribute this message across the Microsoft(tm) Network */

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads