Article View: comp.os.linux.redhat
Article #24Re: RedHat CEO says home users shouldn't use Linux
From: telford
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 12:19
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 12:19
44 lines
3439 bytes
3439 bytes
Ed Murphy <emurphy42@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Here's one of the replies from that same site:
> "They do not restrict redistribution. They void the support contract if
> you are *using* more instances of it than you pay for. You still have
> every right to redistribute the software, and if you redistribute it to
> someone outside your organization they can install it and use it and you
> will not even be in violation of the support agreement."
I have no problem with this but the actual RHEL license says something
different as follows:
Subscription Agreement for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
This Subscription Agreement (the "Agreement") is between Red Hat,
Inc. ("Red Hat") and any purchaser or user ("Customer") of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux AS (or Red Hat Linux Advanced Server), Red Hat
Enterprise Linux ES or Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS (collectively,
"Red Hat Enterprise Linux" or "the Software").
PLEASE READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE PURCHASING OR
USING RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX. BY USING OR PURCHASING RED HAT
ENTERPRISE LINUX, CUSTOMER SIGNIFIES ITS ASSENT TO THIS AGREEMENT.
IF YOU ARE ACTING ON BEHALF OF AN ENTITY, THEN YOU REPRESENT THAT YOU
HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THAT
ENTITY. IF CUSTOMER DOES NOT ACCEPT THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT,
THEN IT MUST NOT USE OR PURCHASE RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX.
Now to me, it seems that RedHat is attempting to say that any purchase
or usage of RHEL will automatically force the user to agree to the
subscription license. If you don't agree to the subscription license
then you can't use the programs which strongly suggests an attempt to
introduce additional restrictions into the GPL.
> Now you can certainly complain up and down about how this is Evil
> Corporate Behavior, if you like. (It sounds reasonable to me: "you
> want to use extra copies, fine, but you're on your own.") But I don't
> think it actually violates the GPL.
As you stated it, no it doesn't, but in that case they need to hire
someone who can write a license that people will understand.
- Tel
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bog2ju$d63$4@au-nws-0001.flow.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-peer1.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-syd!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<pan.2003.11.05.04.09.23.808776@hotmail.com> <17532361.tm2asPQNcB@gregs-web-hosting-and-pickle-farming> <pan.2003.11.05.05.36.24.671893@comcast.net> <1461459.XJWvGJHOOx@gregs-web-hosting-and-pickle-farming> <3967216.Wd7yI970hP@gregs-web-hosting-and-pickle-farming> <pan.2003.11.07.04.31.35.283502@socal.rr.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 107b38,2ea54bd0646aeea X-Google-Attributes: gid107b38,public X-Google-Thread: 102983,a391555474ffb62e X-Google-Attributes: gid102983,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-07 06:23:32 PST From: <telford@xenon.triode.bogus.au> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.redhat,aus.computers.linux Subject: Re: RedHat CEO says home users shouldn't use Linux Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Flow Communications AU Lines: 44 Message-ID: <bog2ju$d63$4@au-nws-0001.flow.com.au> References: <pan.2003.11.05.04.09.23.808776@hotmail.com> <17532361.tm2asPQNcB@gregs-web-hosting-and-pickle-farming> <pan.2003.11.05.05.36.24.671893@comcast.net> <1461459.XJWvGJHOOx@gregs-web-hosting-and-pickle-farming> <3967216.Wd7yI970hP@gregs-web-hosting-and-pickle-farming> <pan.2003.11.07.04.31.35.283502@socal.rr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203-206-152-194.flow.com.au X-Trace: au-nws-0001.flow.com.au 1068207550 13507 203.206.152.194 (7 Nov 2003 12:19:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@au-nws-0001.flow.com.au NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-peer1.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-syd!unknown!not-for-mail