Article View: comp.os.linux.setup
Article #5Re: can ibm architecture support two internal modems?
From: Geoffrey Welsh
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 23:29
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 23:29
60 lines
2971 bytes
2971 bytes
In article <WERNER.96Mar18100602@asta.mc.ab.com>,
werner@asta.mc.ab.com (tim werner) wrote:
>working. The docs for the new card say that COM3/IRQ5 is really COM7.
>
>I don't know what that means. Is it COM3 or COM7? And how do I change
>which /etc files to reflect that difference.
Everyone has a different idea of what COM3 is. IBM said it was a UART at 3E8H
using IRQ4, but that conflicts with COM1's IRQ usage. My hardware background
says that COM3 is a UART at 3E8H no matter what interrupt it uses, which sort
of fits in with the PS/2's idea of using IRQ5 (or was it 2/9?) for COM3.
Windows seems to call the third UART it finds according to a specified search
pattern COM3, no matter what its I/O and interrupt settings are.
As far as Linux goes, if it says that a modem at 3E8H using IRQ5 should be
called COM7 and your modem is configured that way, then call it COM7. SCO
XENIX/UNIX wouldn't bother giving COMx names to serial ports anyway; tty2A,
anyone?
>Furthermore, when I tried to disable the second serial port on my I/O
>card, and have both internal modems installed at the same time, there
>seems to be some kind of IRQ contention, even though I thought that was
>sorted out.
Please note that disabling a serial port doesn't always physically disconnect
the interrupt request driver from the I/O bus. Ideally, your card has a
different jumper position for each potential interrupt and no jumper means no
IRQ line connection.
It's also possible that the conflict is not with IRQs; it may be an I/O port
conflict, an electrical load or interference problem on the I/O bus, etc.
>Here is my current configuration, I think:
>
>I/O card:
> serial port 1: COM1 / IRQ 4
^^^^
Please don't call it COM1; call it 3F8.
> serial port 2: disabled (no jumper, instead of selecting COM2 or COM4)
> printer IRQ: 7
>
>Internal modem 1 (14.4k):
> COM3 / IRQ5
^^^^
3E8?
>Internal modem 2 (28.8k):
> COM2 / IRQ3
^^^^
2F8?
Good luck!
--
Geoffrey Welsh, Developer, InSystems Technologies Inc.
Temporary: crs0794@inforamp.net; At work: insystem@pathcom.com
At home: geoff@zswamp.uucp or [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff
Capitalism is a cold-hearted system which guards the interests of whoever's
at the top, yet hypocritically claims that it offers everyone a fair shot.
So is every other system ever put in place by man.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4ivd53$r3f@sam.inforamp.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!inforamp.net!ts10-03References:
<WERNER.96Mar18100602@asta.mc.ab.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!inforamp.net!ts10-03 From: crs0794@inforamp.net (Geoffrey Welsh) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: can ibm architecture support two internal modems? Date: 22 Mar 1996 23:29:39 GMT Organization: InfoRamp Inc., Toronto, Ontario (416) 363-9100 Message-ID: <4ivd53$r3f@sam.inforamp.net> References: <WERNER.96Mar18100602@asta.mc.ab.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ts10-03.tor.inforamp.net X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4