🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.os.linux.setup
4 messages
4 total messages Started by Rod Tye Sun, 18 Oct 1998 00:00
Parallel port has disappeared
#548
Author: Rod Tye
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 00:00
63 lines
2567 bytes
My parallel port has stopped working!  It used to work.  The only
thing which has changed is that I installed a Dlink DE-220 ethernet
card.  The problem's not the kernel, because the unpatched kernel I
used previously doesn't work now either.  It's not a hardware problem,
because the parallel port works okay if I boot the PC under Windows
95.

My first thought was that it was an IRQ or memory address conflict.
However I've tried the ethernet card under two different IRQs (9 and
11) and three different base addresses (0x280, 0x300 and 0x340) and it
makes no difference (except when I tried IRQ 3 it disabled the serial
port as well.)

My PC is a Pentium 120 running Redhat 4.1, kernel 2.0.27 with
ne2k-pci-diff patch.  The current IRQs and addresses are:

$ cat /proc/interrupts
 0:      15164   timer
 1:        303   keyboard
 2:          0   cascade
 4:        786 + serial
 5:          1   sound blaster
 9:          1   NE2000
13:          1   math error
14:      29540 + ide0
15:          0 + ide1

$ cat /proc/ioports
0000-001f : dma1
0020-003f : pic1
0040-005f : timer
0060-006f : keyboard
0080-009f : dma page reg
00a0-00bf : pic2
00c0-00df : dma2
00f0-00ff : npu
0170-0177 : ide1
01f0-01f7 : ide0
0220-022f : sound blaster
0280-029f : NE2000
02f8-02ff : serial(set)
0376-0376 : ide1
03c0-03df : vga+
03f0-03f5 : floppy
03f6-03f6 : ide0
03f7-03f7 : floppy DIR
03f8-03ff : serial(auto)

(The DE-220 card appears as NE2000.)

From the Windows settings, I expect the parallel port to appear at
addresses 0378-037a, but it's not detected.  There's no relevant
message in dmesg, but there never was even when it was working.

Any suggestions, please?  If possible please reply to the email
address below as well as to this group.


Thank you


Rod Tye
rdtye@iee.org
Re: Parallel port has disappeared
#549
Author: Dan Glover
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 00:00
41 lines
2454 bytes
In article <362A0EBC.A4F6315@girassol.demon.co.uk>, Rod Tye 
<nospam@girassol.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>My parallel port has stopped working!  It used to work.  The only
>thing which has changed is that I installed a Dlink DE-220 ethernet
>card.  The problem's not the kernel, because the unpatched kernel I
>used previously doesn't work now either.  It's not a hardware problem,
>because the parallel port works okay if I boot the PC under Windows
>95.

A completely silly question: does it work properly if you remove the
ethernet card?

>My PC is a Pentium 120 running Redhat 4.1, kernel 2.0.27 with
>ne2k-pci-diff patch.  The current IRQs and addresses are:

[no sign of a parallel port]

>From the Windows settings, I expect the parallel port to appear at
>addresses 0378-037a, but it's not detected.  There's no relevant
>message in dmesg, but there never was even when it was working.

I'm currently running kernel 2.1.126-pre2, with a modular parallel port
driver.  parport0 only appears in /proc/ioports while the module is
loaded.  Are you sure that you're not in a situation where your parallel
port driver is failing to load when required?  (I'm not sure whether the
latest way of handling parport stuff was in 2.0.27.)

>Any suggestions, please?  If possible please reply to the email
>address below as well as to this group.

If I must, though I dislike people setting non-functioning From:
addresses and then asking for replies even more than I dislike people
expecting to get replies by mail in response to news...

Dan

-- 
Dan Glover (dan@dangl.demon.co.uk)
Today's Excuse:
  bank holiday - system operating credits  not recharged
Re: Parallel port has disappeared
#550
Author: David James Spillett
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 00:00
26 lines
2056 bytes
In article <F11Bu8.Dx@dangl.demon.co.uk>, Dan Glover
<news@dangl.demon.co.uk> writes
>>From the Windows settings, I expect the parallel port to appear at
>>addresses 0378-037a, but it's not detected.  There's no relevant
>>message in dmesg, but there never was even when it was working.
>
>I'm currently running kernel 2.1.126-pre2, with a modular parallel port
>driver.  parport0 only appears in /proc/ioports while the module is
>loaded.  Are you sure that you're not in a situation where your parallel
>port driver is failing to load when required?  (I'm not sure whether the
>latest way of handling parport stuff was in 2.0.27.)

Not as such [it isn't in my 2.0.35] but the lp modules _does_ auto-load
on my system [when ppa isn't loaded] so this could indeed be the
problem. Try doing an 'insmod lp' before trying to print and see what
happens.

A believe the 2.1 kernels [and the nearly-here 2.2 ones, of course] use
a different methodology when it comes to parallel ports.


-- 
David James Spillett              Ageing is compulsory
DJSpillett@bigfoot.com                      Maturing is optional...
http://www.djspillett.demon.co.uk (home of WholeSite v1.51,
the one-click web-site updater. Oh, and some strange humour...)
Re: Parallel port has disappeared
#551
Author: Rod Tye
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 00:00
38 lines
2424 bytes
David James Spillett wrote:
> 
> In article <F11Bu8.Dx@dangl.demon.co.uk>, Dan Glover
> <news@dangl.demon.co.uk> writes
> >>From the Windows settings, I expect the parallel port to appear at
> >>addresses 0378-037a, but it's not detected.  There's no relevant
> >>message in dmesg, but there never was even when it was working.
> >
> >I'm currently running kernel 2.1.126-pre2, with a modular parallel port
> >driver.  parport0 only appears in /proc/ioports while the module is
> >loaded.  Are you sure that you're not in a situation where your parallel
> >port driver is failing to load when required?  (I'm not sure whether the
> >latest way of handling parport stuff was in 2.0.27.)
> 
> Not as such [it isn't in my 2.0.35] but the lp modules _does_ auto-load
> on my system [when ppa isn't loaded] so this could indeed be the
> problem. Try doing an 'insmod lp' before trying to print and see what
> happens.
> 
> A believe the 2.1 kernels [and the nearly-here 2.2 ones, of course] use
> a different methodology when it comes to parallel ports.
> 
> --
> David James Spillett              Ageing is compulsory
> DJSpillett@bigfoot.com                      Maturing is optional...
> http://www.djspillett.demon.co.uk (home of WholeSite v1.51,
> the one-click web-site updater. Oh, and some strange humour...)


Ahah, that did the trick.  When I was recompiling the kernel I must have
blown away the /lib/modules/2.0.27 directory.  Restoring it fixed
the problem.

Thanks very much to both of you for your help.


Rod Tye.
rdtye@iee.org
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads