Re: Errno 111 (more info)

Article View: comp.os.linux.x

Article #231

#231

From: Frank Sweetser
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:00

18 lines
1520 bytes

njh_at_smsltd@nospam.demon.co.uk (Nigel Horne) writes:

> Well now, I have traced the difference - the C compiler. Recompiling
> the kernel (linux 2.0.35) with gcc 2.8.1 causes Xfree866 3.3.2 to fail
> with errno 111, using gcc 2.7.2 works fine. No other differences. No
> wacky C compiler options - just the standard ones that come with the
> linux makefile. Any suggestions?

yup.  don't compile the 2.0 kernels with gcc 2.8 - there's some known
problems, and no one's really taking the time to look for the unknown
ones.  the X thing is a known problem.

-- 
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net | PGP key available
paramount.res.wpi.net RedHat 5.2b2 kernel 2.1.122  i586  | at public servers
"I would rather spend 10 hours reading someone else's source code than
10 minutes listening to Musak waiting for technical support which isn't."
(By Dr. Greg Wettstein, Roger Maris Cancer Center)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <87yarhqp3c.fsf@paramount.ind>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <360292a8.96056@news.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: faa64,1f2752eb318f5243
X-Google-Attributes: gidfaa64,public
X-Google-Thread: f4bda,1f2752eb318f5243
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bda,public
X-Google-Thread: f65d0,1f2752eb318f5243
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public
From: Frank Sweetser <rasmusin@paramount.ind>
Subject: Re: Errno 111 (more info)
Date: 1998/09/18
Message-ID: <87yarhqp3c.fsf@paramount.ind>
X-Deja-AN: 392484322
References: <360292a8.96056@news.demon.co.uk>
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.x,alt.os.linux,gnu.gcc

Reply to Parent Message