Re: Mach vs. NT?

Article View: comp.os.mach

Article #1036

#1036

From: Edward Jung
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 08:35

17 lines
1139 bytes

Rick Schneeman writes:

>NT is *not* a microkernel-based OS; NT is *not* based on Mach, nor is
>it blah blah blah; You ask how do I know such things, well, Dave Cutler
>(Microsoft Corporation), and the architect of NT made this observation 
>in a speech at the Micro-Kernel Workshop on Monday April, 27 1992. Maybe
>your confusing the Cairo project that Rick Rashid (from CMU, now with
>Microsoft) is currently working on - why don't we speculate on that some
>now....

Rick Rashid is the Director of Research at Microsoft and a company
architect. He is not directly participating in the Advanced Systems
project often called "Cairo", although we talk from time to time.

--
Edward Jung, Software Architect     edwardj@microsoft.com
Advanced Systems, Microsoft Corp.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec22.083543.2940@microsoft.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!edwardj

References: <Bz2LFA.7qM@eis.calstate.edu> <20409@durer.cme.nist.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!edwardj
From: edwardj@microsoft.com (Edward Jung)
Subject: Re: Mach vs. NT?
Message-ID: <1992Dec22.083543.2940@microsoft.com>
Date: 22 Dec 92 08:35:43 GMT
Organization: Strategy Division, Microsoft Corp.
References: <Bz2LFA.7qM@eis.calstate.edu> <20409@durer.cme.nist.gov>
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message