Article View: comp.os.mach
Article #1038Re: Mach vs. NT?
From: Eirik Lygre
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:28
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:28
38 lines
2207 bytes
2207 bytes
In article <1992Dec21.192229.27548@rchland.ibm.com> tmaas@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Anthony Maas) writes: > >Cairo is more commonly known as Windows NT(New Technology), > Microsoft's supposed foray into the world of OO Operating Systems. > It won't be out however, until sometime next year(or later - > the earliest I've heard is Q3 next year, although I could be, and > probably am, wrong...) I'd wait for NeXTSTEP '486 to come out > myself... which will also probably be Q3 next year. > >Tony Maas >IBM Rochester, MN >Email to maas@cs.uwlax.edu NOT tmaas@laxband.rchland.ibm.com - NeXTmail preferred. > This is wrong. Cairo is not the same as Windows NT. Cairo is the codename for Microsofts next generation user interface. Do not expect to see Cairo (or a product of cairo technology) until 1994. Cairo has been showed publicly at least once, about 6 weeks back. For more information about Cairo, ask questions on comp.os.ms-windows.*. It probably won't do anything, good, though, as not much is known about Cairo. To make a short reference to mach: Microsoft now employes several of the former mach-researchers (I believe one of them was leading the mach project); these people now work mainly on Cairo, and not on Windows NT. It would probably be safe to assume, though, that the do "consultancy work" with the NT group -- they do know some microkernel stuff, after all. Eirik ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Eirik Lygre Phone: +47 4 623766 Kvam data as Fax : +47 4 623985 PO Box 1101 Lura Email: ekl@kvamdata.no N-4301 SANDNES, NORWAY ======================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec22.202832.22160@kvamdata.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!alf.uib.no!hsr.no!fics!eklReferences:
<20409@durer.cme.nist.gov> <BzLpC2.pH@alsvid.une.edu.au> <1992Dec21.192229.27548@rchland.ibm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!alf.uib.no!hsr.no!fics!ekl From: ekl@kvamdata.no (Eirik Lygre) Subject: Re: Mach vs. NT? Organization: Kvam data as Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:28:32 GMT Message-ID: <1992Dec22.202832.22160@kvamdata.no> References: <20409@durer.cme.nist.gov> <BzLpC2.pH@alsvid.une.edu.au> <1992Dec21.192229.27548@rchland.ibm.com> Lines: 38