🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.mach
Article #1038

Re: Mach vs. NT?

#1038
From: Eirik Lygre
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:28
38 lines
2207 bytes
In article <1992Dec21.192229.27548@rchland.ibm.com> tmaas@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Anthony Maas) writes:
>
>Cairo is more commonly known as Windows NT(New Technology),  
> Microsoft's supposed foray into the world of OO Operating Systems.
> It won't be out however, until sometime next year(or later - 
> the earliest I've heard is Q3 next year, although I could be, and 
> probably am, wrong...)  I'd wait for NeXTSTEP '486 to come out 
> myself... which will also probably be Q3 next year.
>
>Tony Maas
>IBM Rochester, MN
>Email to maas@cs.uwlax.edu NOT tmaas@laxband.rchland.ibm.com - NeXTmail preferred.
>

This is wrong. Cairo is not the same as Windows NT. Cairo is the codename
for Microsofts next generation user interface. Do not expect to see Cairo
(or a product of cairo technology) until 1994. Cairo has been showed
publicly at least once, about 6 weeks back.

For more information about Cairo, ask questions on comp.os.ms-windows.*.
It probably won't do anything, good, though, as not much is known about
Cairo.

To make a short reference to mach: Microsoft now employes several of the
former mach-researchers (I believe one of them was leading the mach
project); these people now work mainly on Cairo, and not on Windows NT.
It would probably be safe to assume, though, that the do "consultancy
work" with the NT group -- they do know some microkernel stuff, after
all.

Eirik

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eirik Lygre                                     Phone:    +47 4 623766
Kvam data as                                    Fax  :    +47 4 623985
PO Box 1101 Lura                                Email: ekl@kvamdata.no
N-4301  SANDNES, NORWAY
======================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec22.202832.22160@kvamdata.no>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!alf.uib.no!hsr.no!fics!ekl
References: <20409@durer.cme.nist.gov> <BzLpC2.pH@alsvid.une.edu.au> <1992Dec21.192229.27548@rchland.ibm.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!alf.uib.no!hsr.no!fics!ekl
From: ekl@kvamdata.no (Eirik Lygre)
Subject: Re: Mach vs. NT?
Organization: Kvam data as
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:28:32 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Dec22.202832.22160@kvamdata.no>
References: <20409@durer.cme.nist.gov> <BzLpC2.pH@alsvid.une.edu.au> <1992Dec21.192229.27548@rchland.ibm.com>
Lines: 38