Article View: comp.os.mach
Article #1071Re: Mach vs. NT?
From: Jim Rees
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 21:26
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 21:26
9 lines
930 bytes
930 bytes
In article <J8DNVB1w165w@bluemoon.use.com>, wjg@bluemoon.use.com (william grimm) writes: And, I believe MS hired the developer of Mach- not sure about this, though. I don't know if you really want to say that Rashid is "the" developer of Mach. Certainly many other people worked on it too. But my understanding is that he is head of the research lab at Microsoft and had little to do with Windows NT.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5ceb4a29.cb12@dabo.citi.umich.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!gumby!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!dabo.citi.umich.edu!reesReferences:
<Bz0vGv.38x@eis.calstate.edu> <J8DNVB1w165w@bluemoon.use.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!gumby!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!dabo.citi.umich.edu!rees From: rees@dabo.citi.umich.edu (Jim Rees) Newsgroups: comp.os.mach Subject: Re: Mach vs. NT? Date: 12 Dec 1992 21:26:02 GMT Organization: University of Michigan CITI Lines: 9 Distribution: world Message-ID: <5ceb4a29.cb12@dabo.citi.umich.edu> References: <Bz0vGv.38x@eis.calstate.edu> <J8DNVB1w165w@bluemoon.use.com> Reply-To: Jim.Rees@umich.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: dabo.citi.umich.edu