🚀 go-pugleaf

From article <1992Dec12.000250.14799@microsoft.com>, by jhenshaw@microsoft.com (Jeff Henshaw):
> 
> In article  <Bz2LFA.7qM@eis.calstate.edu>,
> cwilder@eis.calstate.edu (Charlotte Wilder) writes...
> |
> | I don't know if NT is "loosely" based on Mach, but I do know that NT will
> | be a microkernel based operating system.  
> 
> I think it would be safer to say that NT is "loosely based on
> Mach concepts" since some of the ideas (like a microkernel
> architecture) carry over.  NT also has a variety of subsystems

	Excuse my flames that are about to follow. 

	WindowsNT is based on the Mach3.0 micro kernel!!!!!!!!

	I total pissed off that you can all sit there talking volumes
about Windows NT vs Mach, and not one of you have a clue that :-

	1. such a discussion is null and void since mach is not an
		operating system, and WindowNT is!

	2. even worse, mach is part of windowsNT 


	I'd suggest that you :-


	1. Go and do some reading before hitting the keyboard with replies

	2. Don't run about make replies unless you actual have some
		even small idea about the subject.

	No wonder the network suffers so much noise!!!!
	No wonder we are suffering bandwidth problems.

Flame off!

	Cheers
		Mark :)


ps.
	I just noticed that one of you ~~@#####rrrr #icks if from microsoft.com

what is the world coming too, they don't even know their own product ???

	Oh well...
	
-- 
Mark Garrett	Internet:  mark@arvak.une.edu.au	Phone: 	+61 66 20 3859
   University of New England, Northern Rivers, Lismore NSW Australia.