Article View: comp.os.mach
Article #1091Re: Mach vs. NT?
From: John D. Ramsdell
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:23
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:23
14 lines
989 bytes
989 bytes
In article <BzG3Gw.1s6@alsvid.une.edu.au> mark@alsvid.une.edu.au (Mark Garrett Internet: mark@arvak.une.edu.au Phone: +61 66 20 3859) writes: ... WindowsNT is based on the Mach3.0 micro kernel!!!!!!!! ... 2. even worse, mach is part of windowsNT ... Please state your source for these claims. They are at odds with Dave Cutler's remarks and Helen Custer's book. There is no excuse for making sensational claims without providing any supporting evidence. John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<RAMSDELL.92Dec18092322@bigsky.linus.mitre.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!linus!ramsdellShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!linus!ramsdell From: ramsdell@linus.mitre.org (John D. Ramsdell) Subject: Re: Mach vs. NT? Message-ID: <RAMSDELL.92Dec18092322@bigsky.linus.mitre.org> Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service) Nntp-Posting-Host: bigsky.mitre.org Reply-To: ramsdell@mitre.org Organization: Research Computer Facility, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford MA Distribution: comp Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:23:22 GMT Lines: 14