🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.mach
Article #1174

88k version of Mach?

#1174
From: Stuart Ritchie
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1991 21:35
15 lines
1031 bytes
I recall reading sometime ago about someone doing an 88k port of Mach.

Just starting on some 88k kernel hacking myself, I would really like
to get in touch with people who have 88k experience down at the
kernel level.  I have many questions...

For example, how well does the "shootdown" algorithm work when applied to
the 88k?  Is context switching expensive (lots of registers to save and
restore)?  In MP environments, how expensive is cache snooping compared to
write-through?  How well does migrating tasks and threads from CPU to CPU
work (is it worthwhile)?

Eagerly awaiting your postings and replies,

Stuart
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991Jun27.213512.25152@cs.ubc.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!usenet

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!usenet
From: sritchie@cs.ubc.ca (Stuart Ritchie)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: 88k version of Mach?
Message-ID: <1991Jun27.213512.25152@cs.ubc.ca>
Date: 27 Jun 91 21:35:12 GMT
Sender: usenet@cs.ubc.ca (Usenet News)
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Lines: 15