Article View: comp.os.mach
Article #970Re: Mach-O and COFF
From: Guy Harris
Date: Wed, 01 May 1991 17:24
Date: Wed, 01 May 1991 17:24
17 lines
1098 bytes
1098 bytes
>and you can also store core dumps in Mach-O! COFF's replacement in S5R4, ELF, also allows this. >Mach-O is more universal, it allows you to assign start values to >registers (does this work in COFF as well? - I dunno.) Neither COFF nor ELF, as I remember, have this, although one way to assign start values to registers is to stick code to do so at the start address - is the ability to have "exec*()" or its moral equivalent load arbitrary values to registers useful enough that this feature is worth having? >So if COFF isn't that compatible anyway, why not start from scratch >and have a clean start? AT&T appears to agree, hence ELF....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7552@auspex.auspex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!uunet!auspex!guyReferences:
<1991Apr30.054735.7606@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <MIKE.91Apr30163345@yalla.tuwien.ac.at>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!uunet!auspex!guy From: guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) Newsgroups: comp.os.mach Subject: Re: Mach-O and COFF Message-ID: <7552@auspex.auspex.com> Date: 1 May 91 17:24:18 GMT References: <1991Apr30.054735.7606@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <MIKE.91Apr30163345@yalla.tuwien.ac.at> Distribution: na Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara Lines: 17