Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc
Article #4Re: HP Scanjet 3c vs. 3p: feedback, please? (2d post)
From: Leon D. Zetekoff
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 11:00
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 11:00
19 lines
1627 bytes
1627 bytes
David R. Hanson (drh4@midway.uchicago.edu) wrote: : I'm considering purchase of either an HP3p or 3c scanner. I can afford the : 3c, but only want to pay the extra $ if the difference for my uses are : significant. Occasionally, I'll scan in pictures and art, but the bulk of my : scanning work should be in OCR, document storage, (probably on Pagekeeper : 2.0), "copying" with the photocopy utility, etc. I'm using win 3.1, OS/2 : Warp's win-os2, and either Win95 or NT, moving increasingly to one of the : latter as 32-bit win apps get released. I work for SOlution Technology. Some of our corporate stuff deals with OCR or document/image processing. Most companies are using 200 DPI or even 300 DPI when scanning in bills of lading and such (with barcodes). As you go up in DPI, the image size gets larger and processing time it longer. If you are going to do any pictures and stuff having the extra DPI will help downthe road We do have an os2 OCR product. Email solution@gate.net for more info. Thanx leon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<43jjh5$1c7q@news.gate.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!navajo.gate.net!leonReferences:
<DF2to4.I4@midway.uchicago.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!navajo.gate.net!leon From: leon@gate.net (Leon D. Zetekoff) Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc,comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.setup.misc Subject: Re: HP Scanjet 3c vs. 3p: feedback, please? (2d post) Followup-To: comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc,comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.setup.misc Date: 18 Sep 1995 11:00:53 GMT Message-ID: <43jjh5$1c7q@news.gate.net> References: <DF2to4.I4@midway.uchicago.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: navajo.gate.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]