🚀 go-pugleaf

man,
     i have a HPIIcx scanner and works fine.  i see no different in 3c and IIcx as well
as its resolution. also, if we are not image designer , we don't need so much dpi
the iicx is enough verm much for nearly all scanning aaplication. 

BTW, do you know where i can get the 32bits iicx driver so that i can use my
scanner under WINNT3.5

thank you

desmond

drh4@midway.uchicago.edu (David R. Hanson) wrote:
>I'm considering purchase of either an HP3p or 3c scanner.  I can afford the
>3c, but only want to pay the extra $ if the difference for my uses are
>significant.  Occasionally, I'll scan in pictures and art, but the bulk of my
>scanning work should be in OCR, document storage, (probably on Pagekeeper
>2.0), "copying" with the photocopy utility, etc.  I'm using win 3.1, OS/2
>Warp's win-os2, and either Win95 or NT, moving increasingly to one of the
>latter as 32-bit win apps get released.
>
>Thus the question:  do those of you using the 600 dpi, speedier 3c notice a
>significant improvement in these areas over the 3p?  Can we expect the new
>32-bit apps to get more punch from the greater resolution?  Do you notice much
>of a speed difference?  What are your other thoughts on this decision, and
>what applications have you had good luck with?
>
>TIA for any advice,
>
>Dave
>
>
>Dave Hanson                
>drh4@midway.uchicago.edu  
>Philosphy Ph.D. Student, The University of Chicago 
>