Re: HP Scanjet 3c vs. 3p: feedback, please? (2d post)

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc

Article #8

Back to comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc Previous Next

From: Ed Leiken
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 15:58

14 lines
1137 bytes

about HP 3c.

I just bought one and love it.  It works perfectly with win95 
and I can aquire scanned images directly from wordperfect6.1 
and corel paint 5.0.  Included ocr is good, but if you are 
serious I would go for the upgrade offered to omnipage pro.  I 
would DEFINATELY go for the 600 dpi for ocr (or photos).  I 
have scanned magazine articles in and get tons of mistakes at 
300 dpi.  600 dpi rarely makes a mistake.

if you have further questions, email me.

peace
ed

Technical Details

Message-ID: <43mpaf$sb6@ccnet2.ccnet.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ccnet.com!usenet

References: <DF2to4.I4@midway.uchicago.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ccnet.com!usenet
From: Ed Leiken <deaded@ccnet.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc,comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Subject: Re: HP Scanjet 3c vs. 3p: feedback, please? (2d post)
Date: 19 Sep 1995 15:58:07 GMT
Organization: CCnet Communications (510-988-7140 guest)
Message-ID: <43mpaf$sb6@ccnet2.ccnet.com>
References: <DF2to4.I4@midway.uchicago.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: h96-164.ccnet.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.2b6 (Windows; I; 32bit)
To: drh4@midway.uchicago.edu

Reply to Parent Message