Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc
Article #87Scitor Project Scheduler 6 / Microsoft Project 4
From: David Sim
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 1994 16:29
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 1994 16:29
18 lines
1475 bytes
1475 bytes
A collegue has asked me to post requesting any comments users may have
on the relative merits of Scitor Project Scheduler 6 and Microsoft
Project 4. Reviews we've seen have placed them about equal, but some of
Scitors documentation suggests some problems with MS Project 4.
Any comments. I personally have used MS Project 3, and found it to be a
very useful tool.
Dave.
--
David Sim === Internet Home: David.Sim@almac.co.uk
MA / MIAP === Internet Business: dave@grcfin.demon.co.uk
=== Fidonet: DAVID SIM at 2:259/17
=== Almac: DAVID SIM
Business: Grampian Regional Council Finance Department
MY VIEWS : Definately *NOT* my employer's (probably!)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<103941125wnr@grcfin.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!demon!grcfin.demon.co.uk!fn0156Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fda7f,b97e543ed96f4c81,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfda7f,public X-Google-Thread: fb525,b97e543ed96f4c81,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb525,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-01 08:38:48 PST Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.apps.misc,demon.ip.support.pc From: fn0156@grcfin.demon.co.uk (David Sim) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!demon!grcfin.demon.co.uk!fn0156 Subject: Scitor Project Scheduler 6 / Microsoft Project 4 Distribution: world Organization: Grampian Regional Council Finance Department Reply-To: fn0156@grcfin.demon.co.uk X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.6 Lines: 20 Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 16:29:58 +0000 Message-ID: <103941125wnr@grcfin.demon.co.uk> Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk