🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.apps
Article #4012

Re: (Summary) Word/W4W/WP: Which is best?

#4012
From: 5916rahmank
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 01:27
49 lines
2878 bytes
In article <1993Jan08.191626.28426@eng.umd.edu>, lindor@eng.umd.edu (Lindor 
Eric Henrickson) writes:

 I don't think I'd equate field codes (a macro thing, right?) with an
 equation writing language, like the one used in Wordperfect (which is
 similar to something like Tex)

	I think its a matter of getting used to. Actually, the {eq } field
	has an advantage. One can split the document into two panes and
	type field codes in one pane and view the results in another. The
	field codes are pretty much similar (but not same) to equation 
	writing codes.

>>        One very important draw back (IMO) of wordperfect (5.?) is that
>>        even it is a windows app, it can not use some custom fonts that
>>        other win apps like WfW, Ami pro, excel, ... can use.
>
 Like what for instance?  WP4WIN supports True Type fonts (via windows),
 ATM fonts, etc....  Maybe there's something else I'm not aware of, though..

	I use some bitstream (actually bitstream compatible) fonts that
	allow me use a foreign language alphabet via windows applications.
	But those fonts could not be used in WP (dos) because it does not
	support 'screen font.' I was hopping that WPfWIN would support it,
	but does not. I donno if wpfwin 5.2 does it. Can somebody give me
	this info?


 Yes, I agree, choice of a word processor involves many factors,
 a very personal kind of thing.  Actually, if you're planning to
 buy a wordprocessor, my advice is to see if the various companies
 have 30/60/90 day money back guarantees, then buy the wordprocessor
 you think you'll like and try it out.  If you don't like it, send it back and
 try the next one on the list.  Or, find a friend who has
 the wordprocessor you're interested in, and fiddle around with it
 for awhile.( yes, this takes a little time, but if you're a serious
 writer it'll be worth it).  That's what I did, and I found that
 I liked WP the best...  but again (as I stated before) this is just my opinion,
 you may find that you hate it, love it, or whatever...
 

 LH
 lindor@eng.umd.edu

	That's the whole purpose of posting such a question on the net
	so that the net-friends can throw their experience they have
	already earned. 

	-Anis.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <00966838.1E006CC0@vms.csd.mu.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!vms.csd.mu.edu!5916RAHMANK
References: <19930107134926EEY9JJT@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU> <1993Jan08.074928.20161@eng.umd.edu> <009664C8.40D16560@vms.csd.mu.edu>,<1993Jan08.191626.28426@eng.umd.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!vms.csd.mu.edu!5916RAHMANK
From: 5916rahmank@vms.csd.mu.edu ( )
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.apps
Subject: Re: (Summary)  Word/W4W/WP:  Which is best?
Date: 13 Jan 1993 01:27:51 GMT
Organization: Department of EECE, Marquette University
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <00966838.1E006CC0@vms.csd.mu.edu>
References: <19930107134926EEY9JJT@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU> <1993Jan08.074928.20161@eng.umd.edu> <009664C8.40D16560@vms.csd.mu.edu>,<1993Jan08.191626.28426@eng.umd.edu>
Reply-To: 5916rahmank@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsf.csd.mu.edu