Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.apps
Article #4012Re: (Summary) Word/W4W/WP: Which is best?
From: 5916rahmank
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 01:27
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 01:27
49 lines
2878 bytes
2878 bytes
In article <1993Jan08.191626.28426@eng.umd.edu>, lindor@eng.umd.edu (Lindor
Eric Henrickson) writes:
I don't think I'd equate field codes (a macro thing, right?) with an
equation writing language, like the one used in Wordperfect (which is
similar to something like Tex)
I think its a matter of getting used to. Actually, the {eq } field
has an advantage. One can split the document into two panes and
type field codes in one pane and view the results in another. The
field codes are pretty much similar (but not same) to equation
writing codes.
>> One very important draw back (IMO) of wordperfect (5.?) is that
>> even it is a windows app, it can not use some custom fonts that
>> other win apps like WfW, Ami pro, excel, ... can use.
>
Like what for instance? WP4WIN supports True Type fonts (via windows),
ATM fonts, etc.... Maybe there's something else I'm not aware of, though..
I use some bitstream (actually bitstream compatible) fonts that
allow me use a foreign language alphabet via windows applications.
But those fonts could not be used in WP (dos) because it does not
support 'screen font.' I was hopping that WPfWIN would support it,
but does not. I donno if wpfwin 5.2 does it. Can somebody give me
this info?
Yes, I agree, choice of a word processor involves many factors,
a very personal kind of thing. Actually, if you're planning to
buy a wordprocessor, my advice is to see if the various companies
have 30/60/90 day money back guarantees, then buy the wordprocessor
you think you'll like and try it out. If you don't like it, send it back and
try the next one on the list. Or, find a friend who has
the wordprocessor you're interested in, and fiddle around with it
for awhile.( yes, this takes a little time, but if you're a serious
writer it'll be worth it). That's what I did, and I found that
I liked WP the best... but again (as I stated before) this is just my opinion,
you may find that you hate it, love it, or whatever...
LH
lindor@eng.umd.edu
That's the whole purpose of posting such a question on the net
so that the net-friends can throw their experience they have
already earned.
-Anis.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<00966838.1E006CC0@vms.csd.mu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!vms.csd.mu.edu!5916RAHMANKReferences:
<19930107134926EEY9JJT@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU> <1993Jan08.074928.20161@eng.umd.edu> <009664C8.40D16560@vms.csd.mu.edu>,<1993Jan08.191626.28426@eng.umd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!vms.csd.mu.edu!5916RAHMANK From: 5916rahmank@vms.csd.mu.edu ( ) Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.apps Subject: Re: (Summary) Word/W4W/WP: Which is best? Date: 13 Jan 1993 01:27:51 GMT Organization: Department of EECE, Marquette University Lines: 49 Message-ID: <00966838.1E006CC0@vms.csd.mu.edu> References: <19930107134926EEY9JJT@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU> <1993Jan08.074928.20161@eng.umd.edu> <009664C8.40D16560@vms.csd.mu.edu>,<1993Jan08.191626.28426@eng.umd.edu> Reply-To: 5916rahmank@vms.csd.mu.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsf.csd.mu.edu