🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <MMORSE.169.743104544@nsf.gov> MMORSE@nsf.gov (Michael Morse) writes:
>>With Borland you have to learn the Windows coding up front. With VC++
>>you do not, it can be quite simply a fill in the blanks learning experence.
>>With VC++ you take on the learning of Windows one step or area at a time, not
>
>How easy it is to learn something, and what you need to know when, are 
>obviously very subjective...   ...Nonetheless, you are the first person
I've heard from (out of scores) that thinks that >VC++ is easy to learn.  

 I guess you can count me as the second.

>My experience is that with VC++ you must first learn Windows programming, 
>then learn the MS Foundation Classes, and then you can start learning the 
>Class Wizard and Apps Studio.  Powerful features, no doubt, but not easy to 
>learn by my standards.

 I have so far been able to largely ignore "Windows" and simply learn
the MFC for all the UI stuff I need for interface to my code. I don't
think it's implicitly necessary to learn "Windows" if you focus on the
MFC and how it works...

>--Mike

-- 
Michael      | Department of {chaos != anarchy ? order : entropy}
   Aichlmayr | Genasys II, Inc., 2629 Redwing RD    ~  ~ __o
             | Ft. Collins CO 80526 USA           ~  ~ _-\<,_
             | Internet: mikla@genasys.com     ~    ~ (_)/ (_)