Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Article #3134Re: NETCOM acount deleted "accidentally", please read
From: Bruce Sterling Woodcock
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 00:00
53 lines
3638 bytes
3638 bytes
In article <stellaD6qCMC.BvM@netcom.com> stella@netcom.com (Steven J. Tella) writes: >In article <rapD6JEC0.4H8@netcom.com>, Robert A. Pease <rap@netcom.com> wrote: >>I don't really care if someone got their files restored because they made a >>big fuss. >I just wish that when I lost my files, I'd been able to make an >equivalent-sized fuss. Yes, this is truly unfortunate. Basically, NETCOM did stick to the policy against most backup restorals for a long time, but then when a few very inexperienced managers came in and didn't listen to their own people, it quickly became true that if you screamed loud enough, you could get restored. This is yet another example of the incompetence of Netcom management. Yes, it might be good customer service to help those who really needed it, but unfortunately, Netcom couldn't *afford* to do that for every customer. So to avoid that, you have a public policy different from a private policy, and you have people playing games with the truth. >I got told that restoral would interfere with the process of making >backups. > >(Huh?) Exactly what about this do you not understand? It was very true at the time; it may still be. Netcom had a very primitive backup system. >>only reaction to that is that if they don't have their backup software >>logging every file and its location, then they need to hire a new backup >>administrator. >Yep. It wasn't an admin issue. It was an unwillingness of management to spend the resources on putting in a good backup system, and then hiring enough admins to handle to new workload. I had a chance to do some reviewing of such a system while I was there, but never had to time to, because I was too busy fighting other, higher-priority problems, and spending 16 hours a day doing that because they didn't hire the 2 admins I needed 3 months earlier. >>By the way. I was told that they would restore the file if it was their >>fault that it was deleted. ?!? > >Right. And since it never is.... This is misleading. I myself have restored files that Netcom was responsible for deleting. It is very, very, very rare, but is has happened. Bruce -- Bruce Sterling Woodcock --- Systems Analyst / Admin --- sterling@netcom.com The views and opinions expressed in this post | Power is being able are not necessarily those of my former employer, | to sneak into your NETCOM On-line Communication Services. | house over a wire.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bswD77t1w.4FL@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3lr8mi$rpu@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <rapD6JEC0.4H8@netcom.com> <stellaD6qCMC.BvM@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,7a5c65958e97335 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 1102f1,7a5c65958e97335 X-Google-Attributes: gid1102f1,public X-Google-Thread: f79f6,7a5c65958e97335 X-Google-Attributes: gidf79f6,public X-Google-Thread: ffdd0,7a5c65958e97335 X-Google-Attributes: gidffdd0,public X-Google-Thread: 113c94,7a5c65958e97335 X-Google-Attributes: gid113c94,public X-Google-Thread: f824f,7a5c65958e97335 X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public X-Google-Thread: 10a922,7a5c65958e97335 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a922,public From: bsw@netcom.com (Bruce Sterling Woodcock) Subject: Re: NETCOM acount deleted "accidentally", please read Date: 1995/04/18 Message-ID: <bswD77t1w.4FL@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 101101165 sender: bsw@netcom23.netcom.com references: <3lr8mi$rpu@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <rapD6JEC0.4H8@netcom.com> <stellaD6qCMC.BvM@netcom.com> organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,ba.general,ca.general,ca.usenet,alt.peeves,alt.online-service.america-online,netcom.general