Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.nt
Article #96Re: Win NT or Win 95 -- Which is better with C++? Help!
From: Troy Barlow
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 00:00
46 lines
3263 bytes
3263 bytes
Jackson Harris wrote: > NT is definitely the way to go, especially since version 4.0...due out > later this summer incorporates the WIN95 GUI > you may need just a little more RAM for NT, but it will repay you for > the investment many times over in improved stability > get NT I've had NT installed for about 2 years. I also have Win95 and Win for Workgroups installed. The machine is a 133 Mhz Pentium, 32 megs of ram, and a 2 GIG SCSI. We use VC++ 4.1. I would also say that NT is more stable than Win95. However, twice this has happend: Boot NT, checkdsk discovers a few crossed links, and fixes them Next day (or lateron) Boot NT, checkdisk discovers more bad files and DIRs. It try's to fix them and runs out of memory (this all happens on the Blue Screen at bootup). Boot NT, checkdsk discovers .... blah ... blah Eventualy it will destroy the Windows\system32 dir rendering NT useless. A few things to note: We had this happen on 3 machines. All 3 were using the latest version (3.51) with service pack 3 installed. It wasnt a virus (well none that I know of) since we check any disks that go into the machines, and very few ever do. None of the machines were using NTFS, all were FAT. We didnt use defrag or any utilities that could corrupt the drive or screw up the long filenames. In fact we never used any dos utilites since we are aware of things like rename and delete screwing up long filenames. We have no idea what the problem is/was. It seems to have something to do with very large partitions (> 1 GIG). We tried using NTFS, and after a while it still happened. Another note about NT. It is far from crash proof. While debugging an app I was working on, I trashed NT by free'ing data that was in the clipboard, and also embeded in another document with OLE. Of course, it was my fault, but I was new to OLE ;-) My opinion is if you dont have tons of ram (>= 32 MB) and a large HD, use Win95. No matter what you use, backup often cause both of these O/S can trash your hard drive. Troy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<318243C1.434C@skypoint.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4l7dap$f1f@news.wco.com> <317B6591.4CEA@tu-harburg.d400.de> <4lp449$e3l@klf.netconnect.com.au> <4lq9aa$n58@desert.snafu.de> <3180D2FF.7CD8@avana.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 118d9b,d1bc1cebb609e06b X-Google-Attributes: gid118d9b,public X-Google-Thread: fa335,d1bc1cebb609e06b X-Google-Attributes: gidfa335,public X-Google-Thread: 104cb0,d1bc1cebb609e06b X-Google-Attributes: gid104cb0,public X-Google-Thread: 115767,d1bc1cebb609e06b X-Google-Attributes: gid115767,public X-Google-Thread: fad41,d1bc1cebb609e06b X-Google-Attributes: gidfad41,public X-Google-Thread: 1125fa,d1bc1cebb609e06b X-Google-Attributes: gid1125fa,public From: Troy Barlow <tbarlow@skypoint.com> Subject: Re: Win NT or Win 95 -- Which is better with C++? Help! Date: 1996/04/27 Message-ID: <318243C1.434C@skypoint.com> X-Deja-AN: 151727950 references: <4l7dap$f1f@news.wco.com> <317B6591.4CEA@tu-harburg.d400.de> <4lp449$e3l@klf.netconnect.com.au> <4lq9aa$n58@desert.snafu.de> <3180D2FF.7CD8@avana.net> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: SkyPoint Communications, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.nt,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,fido.ger.win95,fj.os.win-nt,kiel.computer.windows.win95 x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)