Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
Article #1729Re: F****d Borland forgot to define the message in BC 3.1's windows.h !!!!!
From: Scott Evernden
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 02:18
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 02:18
27 lines
1538 bytes
1538 bytes
In article <1992Dec9.045940@avsht.sph.spb.su> avsht@sph.spb.su writes: >Hi, people! > >Trying to recompile my Windows project under BC 3.1, I was wondering >very much when compiler suddenly reported me that he doesn't know >the message WM_PAINTICON. I looked into windows.h and didn't find it!!! >Although nearest win30.h file (former windows.h from BC 3.0) >defines it. > >1. Is it Borland mistake or mine? >2. What is the best way to avoid it: > - to feed bcc the option -DWM_PAINTICON=0x0026 > - to change windows.h by adding #define WM_PAINTICON 0x0026 > - another way 1. Your mistake, sort of. WM_PAINTICON doesn't appear in either Borland's or Microsoft's windows.h However, according to my handy copy of "Undocumented Windows", WM_PAINTICON is documented/defined only in the 3.1 DDK and WIN32 API. 2. Either approach is best... -scott ---- GrayMatter Software Co. Holliston, MA 508 429-7867 spe@world.std.com scott@opl.com user interface and application development technologies and tools
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec14.021810.6214@unixland.natick.ma.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!unixland!scottReferences:
<1992Dec9.045940@avsht.sph.spb.su>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!unixland!scott From: scott@unixland.natick.ma.us (Scott Evernden) Subject: Re: F****d Borland forgot to define the message in BC 3.1's windows.h !!!!! Message-ID: <1992Dec14.021810.6214@unixland.natick.ma.us> Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix & Think_Tank BBS References: <1992Dec9.045940@avsht.sph.spb.su> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 02:18:10 GMT Lines: 28