Article View: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
Article #1832Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Visual Basic 2.0
From: Mark Plutowksi
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 19:57
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 19:57
22 lines
1178 bytes
1178 bytes
DRPORTER@SUVM.SYR.EDU (Brad Porter) writes: >The only thing I can respond to in this article is the question pertaining to >learning curve on Visual Basic. When it comes to designing the interface >and creating the dialog box - one full day would get anyone remotely familiar >with programming up to speed. I've written in C for DOS and Visual Basic is >hundreds of times easier with user interface. I can't offer any advice on >ease of importing C++ code, or doing database work, but as for ease of design Does it generate C-like source, and can this be easily modified? Can it be used with different compilers, like Zortech or Borland? Thanks, = Mark UCSD CSE La Jolla CA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<42832@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!biosci!ucselx!network.ucsd.edu!sdcc12!cs!plutoReferences:
<1992Dec20.171741.29641@eng.umd.edu> <168C5113C5.DRPORTER@SUVM.SYR.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!biosci!ucselx!network.ucsd.edu!sdcc12!cs!pluto From: pluto@cs.ucsd.edu (Mark Plutowksi) Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc Subject: Re: Borland C++ 3.1 vs Visual Basic 2.0 Message-ID: <42832@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> Date: 23 Dec 92 19:57:07 GMT References: <1992Dec20.171741.29641@eng.umd.edu> <168C5113C5.DRPORTER@SUVM.SYR.EDU> Sender: news@sdcc12.ucsd.edu Lines: 22 Nntp-Posting-Host: beowulf.ucsd.edu